29.12.2012 Views

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.2 From M<strong>and</strong>ate to Partition<br />

From the Nakba to the Present Day – Ongoing Displacement<br />

From the beginning of the British M<strong>and</strong>ate in Palestine in 1922, through to the end of 1947, when the United<br />

Nations recommended that the country be partitioned into two states, nearly one-tenth of the <strong>Palestinian</strong> Arab<br />

population was <strong>for</strong>ced to leave home, expelled, or denationalized. Tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s of <strong>Palestinian</strong> Arabs were<br />

also internally displaced during this period as a result of Zionist colonization, the eviction of tenant farmers,<br />

<strong>and</strong> punitive home demolitions by the British administration.<br />

During the First World War, Allied <strong>for</strong>ces under British comm<strong>and</strong> occupied Palestine, which was then one of<br />

several Arab territory that were part of the Ottoman Empire. In November 1917, the British cabinet issued<br />

the Balfour Declaration. 10 The one-page letter from Arthur Balfour, the British Secretary of Foreign Affairs to<br />

Lord Rothschild, head of the British Zionist Federation, granted explicit recognition of <strong>and</strong> support <strong>for</strong> the<br />

idea of establishing a Jewish “national home” in Palestine through immigration <strong>and</strong> colonization.<br />

At the time, Jews constituted only 8% of the population of Palestine, 11 <strong>and</strong> owned less than 3% of the total<br />

l<strong>and</strong> in the country. 12 The majority of the indigenous Jewish community of Palestine did not support the<br />

Zionist idea of creating a separate <strong>and</strong> exclusive Jewish state in the country. 13 Despite widespread <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />

Arab opposition to the Balfour Declaration, Great Britain viewed Zionist colonization as a way to advance<br />

British interests in the region. 14<br />

A year later, in November 1918, France <strong>and</strong> Great Britain signed the Anglo-French Declaration, which affirmed<br />

that their goal “[... was] the complete <strong>and</strong> final liberation of the peoples who have <strong>for</strong> so long been oppressed<br />

by the Turks, <strong>and</strong> the setting up of national governments <strong>and</strong> administrations deriving their authority from<br />

the free exercise of the initiative <strong>and</strong> choice of the indigenous populations” [emphasis added]. 15<br />

In 1919, the Allied powers met in Paris to determine the status of those non-self-governing territory that<br />

had been part of the <strong>for</strong>mer Ottoman Empire. Member states of the League of Nations decided to establish<br />

a temporary “M<strong>and</strong>ate System” in accordance with the Covenant of the League of Nations to facilitate the<br />

independence of these territory. 16 The August 1920 Treaty of Sèvres between the Allied Powers <strong>and</strong> Turkey<br />

affirmed that Palestine “be provisionally recognised as an independent State subject to the rendering of<br />

administrative advice <strong>and</strong> assistance by a M<strong>and</strong>atory until such time as they are able to st<strong>and</strong> alone.” 17<br />

In 1920, the League of Nations entrusted the temporary administration (“M<strong>and</strong>ate”) of Palestine to Great<br />

Britain, as a “Class A” M<strong>and</strong>ate (one perceived to be closest to independence). 18 The M<strong>and</strong>ate <strong>for</strong> Palestine,<br />

however, aimed to facilitate the colonization of the country through Jewish immigration, settlement, <strong>and</strong><br />

colonization in order “to secure the establishment of the Jewish national home”, in line with the political<br />

commitment set out in the Balfour Declaration. The M<strong>and</strong>ate accorded the Jewish minority in the country<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-resident Jews residing elsewhere full political rights; it granted the <strong>Palestinian</strong> Arab majority only<br />

civil <strong>and</strong> religious rights.<br />

“[I]n the case of the ‘independent nation’ of Palestine,” observed the British Secretary of Foreign Affairs,<br />

“we do not propose even to go through the <strong>for</strong>m of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the<br />

country” (as was required by the League of Nations). “Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted<br />

in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires <strong>and</strong><br />

prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient l<strong>and</strong>.” 19 These conflicting intentions gave rise<br />

to the inherent contradiction of the M<strong>and</strong>ate of Palestine: the simultaneous establishment of an independent<br />

state of Palestine <strong>for</strong> all its citizens on the territory of M<strong>and</strong>ate Palestine, <strong>and</strong> a Jewish national home within<br />

or on that same territory.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!