29.12.2012 Views

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118<br />

Survey of <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Refugee</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Internally Displaced Persons (2006-2007)<br />

4.3 Protection in Israel <strong>and</strong> the 1967-occupied <strong>Palestinian</strong> Territory<br />

Instruments <strong>and</strong> Mechanisms<br />

Unlike Arab host states, Israel has a special obligation to protect <strong>Palestinian</strong> refugees <strong>and</strong> IDPs <strong>for</strong> a number of<br />

reasons: Israel as a successor state to pre-1948 Palestine is the country of origin of the majority of <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />

refugees <strong>and</strong> IDPs; it has played a direct role in their protracted <strong>for</strong>ced displacement; <strong>and</strong> a heightened protection<br />

regime applies under international humanitarian law to those <strong>Palestinian</strong> civilians, including refugees <strong>and</strong> IDPs,<br />

residing in the occupied West Bank <strong>and</strong> Gaza Strip. Israel thus has a primary obligation to protect, including the<br />

facilitation of durable solutions.<br />

Israel is a signatory to the 1951 <strong>Refugee</strong> Convention (but not to the 1967 Protocol), but does not apply this in the<br />

case of <strong>Palestinian</strong> refugees. Neither does Israel apply the 1998 Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement to<br />

internally displaced <strong>Palestinian</strong>s. Israel is a signatory to the Fourth Geneva Convention, but does not recognize its<br />

de jure applicability to the occupied <strong>Palestinian</strong> territory, 63 <strong>and</strong> argues that international human rights conventions<br />

do not apply to their population. The Israeli High Court has however accepted the de facto application of certain<br />

provisions to the OPT.<br />

4.3.1 Protection of <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Refugee</strong>s <strong>and</strong> IDPs in Israel<br />

a) The right to protection from persecution <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>cible displacement<br />

Israel’s domestic law is designed to exclude <strong>Palestinian</strong> refugees <strong>and</strong> IDPs from the right of return, citizenship/<br />

residency rights, <strong>and</strong> the right to housing <strong>and</strong> property restitution. Israel’s domestic law af<strong>for</strong>ds preferential treatment<br />

to Jews in accordance with Israel’s status as a “Jewish state”. 64 Israel thereby violates its obligation to facilitate<br />

repatriation <strong>and</strong> restitution <strong>for</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> refugees <strong>and</strong> IDPs. Moreover, discriminatory laws <strong>and</strong> policies violate<br />

the protected rights of all <strong>Palestinian</strong> citizens of Israel (including those of <strong>Palestinian</strong> IDPs).<br />

Israeli policeman guarding a bulldozer demolishing <strong>Palestinian</strong> homes in the Naqab. April 2005.<br />

(© source: akhbarna.com)<br />

More than a quarter of a million<br />

internally displaced <strong>Palestinian</strong>s<br />

reside in Israel. Internally displaced<br />

<strong>Palestinian</strong>s are citizens of Israel. 65 Israel’s<br />

domestic law there<strong>for</strong>e regulates<br />

protection. The number of IDPs in<br />

Israel continues to increase as a result<br />

of home demolition <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> confiscation.<br />

Recent examples include the<br />

arbitrary displacement <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>ced<br />

resettlement of Bedouin <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />

citizens to “concentration cities” in<br />

the Naqab (Negev) under the guise<br />

of “development plans” <strong>for</strong> Jews only.<br />

Israel thus fails to protect <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />

citizens from arbitrary displacement.<br />

(See Chapter One)<br />

Moreover, discrimination <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>cible displacement are encouraged by the state of Israel through tolerance of<br />

racist public campaigns, headed by members of the political establishment in Israel, that call <strong>for</strong> the “transfer” of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!