29.12.2012 Views

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Demonstration, London, 9 June 2007 © Enough Occupation Campaign.<br />

Politics <strong>and</strong> the Question of <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Refugee</strong>s <strong>and</strong> IDPs<br />

between Jews <strong>and</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong>s; Israel’s recognition of its responsibility <strong>for</strong> the Nakba; acknowledgement of the<br />

status <strong>and</strong> rights of <strong>Palestinian</strong>s as an indigenous people <strong>and</strong> national minority; <strong>and</strong> respect <strong>for</strong> the right to social,<br />

religious, cultural <strong>and</strong> national ties with the rest of the <strong>Palestinian</strong> people. 84 Similar proposals are being in<strong>for</strong>mally<br />

debated among civil society organizations <strong>and</strong> networks in the OPT <strong>and</strong> Israel. The Israeli organization Zochrot,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, believes that any solution to the conflict “must include equal rights <strong>for</strong> all the peoples of this l<strong>and</strong>,<br />

including the right of <strong>Palestinian</strong>s to return to their homes.” 85<br />

5.4.3 International Human Rights Organizations<br />

Human rights organizations continue to remind the parties to the conflict <strong>and</strong> states of their obligations under<br />

international law. In 2005, <strong>for</strong> instance, Human Rights Watch noted in a letter to US President George W. Bush that<br />

despite international condemnation, “the international community, including the United States, has failed to hold<br />

Israel accountable to its obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention to cease Israeli settlement activity.” 86<br />

In 2006, Amnesty International reaffirmed that “the right to return to one’s own country is based in international<br />

law <strong>and</strong> is the most obvious way to redress the situation of those who are in exile.” 87 In a statement to the Quartet,<br />

it also noted that:<br />

[t]he history of the conflict <strong>and</strong> the repeated failure of previous peace initiatives, in which human rights<br />

were subordinated to political considerations, st<strong>and</strong> as compelling evidence that such an approach will<br />

bring neither durable peace nor security <strong>and</strong>, indeed, may further exacerbate the divisions <strong>and</strong> hamper<br />

the search <strong>for</strong> peace. A durable resolution, one which guarantees peace <strong>and</strong> security to both Israelis<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong>s, can only be achieved if key problems which have been left to fester are addressed in<br />

a constructive manner, on the basis of respect <strong>for</strong> human rights <strong>and</strong> international law. 88<br />

The organization also recommended that the Quartet “not continue to subordinate fundamental human rights<br />

to political considerations, <strong>and</strong> … put in place concrete mechanisms to ensure that all parties comply with their<br />

obligations under international human rights <strong>and</strong> humanitarian law.” 89<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!