Regional Reports - the European External Action Service
Regional Reports - the European External Action Service
Regional Reports - the European External Action Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Regarding typologies, <strong>the</strong> findings showed that regional NGOs are <strong>the</strong> most important NSA in<br />
terms of amount of resource mobilized (57%). More specifically, REST alone has 12 ongoing<br />
projects <strong>the</strong> total value of which is about 95% of <strong>the</strong> indicated regional NGO projects. The<br />
resource inputs of <strong>the</strong> national and international secular NGOs is dwarfed by <strong>the</strong> amount<br />
mobilized and used by REST to implement <strong>the</strong> capital intensive and extensive rural food security<br />
projects.<br />
3.3. Zonal Distribution of Ongoing Projects<br />
As shown below (Table 5), a good amount of <strong>the</strong> financial contributions from NSA went to <strong>the</strong><br />
Central Tigray Zone. It is interesting to note that <strong>the</strong> zone where many NGOs are operational<br />
(Mekele) is <strong>the</strong> least in <strong>the</strong> financial value of projects. This illustrates as how <strong>the</strong> urban-based<br />
social projects are small-scale in nature compared to <strong>the</strong> rural projects.<br />
Table 5: NSA project finance by zones<br />
No of No of<br />
Zones<br />
Projects NGOs Value of <strong>the</strong> Projects, Birr<br />
Central 8 3 161,029,651<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn 13 10 57,442,136<br />
Western 7 6 57,250,313<br />
Eastern 10 5 55,859,482<br />
Mekele 16 15 30,589,197<br />
<strong>Regional</strong> and multi-zone<br />
projects<br />
12 10 129,899,053<br />
66 492,069,831<br />
3.4. Sectoral Participation<br />
The disaggregated profile of ongoing NGO projects with respect to core sectoral focuses is<br />
illustrated on Table 6, below. Integrated food security programmes, often comprising agricultural<br />
development supports, infrastructures (access roads, irrigation), environmental rehabilitation,<br />
WATSAN, HIV/AIDS, basic education, entrepreneurship, and institutional streng<strong>the</strong>ning, are <strong>the</strong><br />
most important participation areas of <strong>the</strong> NGOs, both in number of projects and total resource<br />
allocated. REST, WVE, AAE, EEC/ADCS, EOC/DICA and EECMY are <strong>the</strong> lead organizations<br />
involved in this area.<br />
Child development, particularly care and support for OVC, in institutionalized as well as noninstitutionalized<br />
arrangements is <strong>the</strong> second important participation area of NSA in Tigray. In<br />
this area, on top of <strong>the</strong> long-established child-support centres of <strong>the</strong> FBOs (EOC/CFAD and<br />
ECC/ADCS) <strong>the</strong> innovative and community-based projects of <strong>the</strong> newly established regional<br />
NGO Human beings Association of Bro<strong>the</strong>rhood (HAB) is fast expanding coverage of NSA<br />
involvement in OVC support.<br />
The level of resource allocation for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sectoral and cross-cutting areas appears to be small<br />
for two major reasons. In <strong>the</strong> first place, most of <strong>the</strong>se activities are promoted as component<br />
elements of <strong>the</strong> integrated rural food security projects and programmes. Secondly, some of <strong>the</strong><br />
sectoral projects are implemented by <strong>the</strong> regional NSA without entering formal project<br />
agreements at regional levels. Hence, resource allocated is not included in <strong>the</strong> survey. For<br />
example, CBOs like Iddirs, Anti-AIDS and SRH Clubs, and <strong>the</strong> MBAs are involved in: child<br />
98