Cunningham, S. J., & Frank, E. (1999). Market basket analysis of library circulation data. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Neural Information Processing, Australia, 825-830. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warsaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer <strong>Technology</strong>: A Comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. DeLone, W. & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. Fishben, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison- Wesley. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B., & Terry, D. (1992). Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of ACM, 35(12), 61-70. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management Learning, 40(6), 541-549. Howe, A.E. & Dreilinger, D. (1997) Savvysearch: A meta-search engine that learns which search engines to query. AI Magazine, 18(2), 19-25. Hsu, C. L. &. Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management Learning, 41(7), 853-868. Hu, R. & Pu, P. (2009) Acceptance Issues of Personality-based Recommender Systems. Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, USA, 221-224. Johannes, S., Matthias, H., Christoph, R., & Ralf, S. (2008). Adapting the user context in realtime: Tailoring online machine learning algorithms to ambient computing. Mobile Networks and Applications, 13(6), 583-598. Johansson, F. (2006). The Medici Effect: What You Can Learn from Elephants and Epidemics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analysis rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200. Karypis, G. (2001). Evaluation of Item-Based Top-N Recommendation Algorithms. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Knowledge management, USA, 247-254. Krulwich, B., & Burkey, C. (1997). The InfoFinder agent: Learning user interests through heuristic phrase extraction. IEEE Intelligent Systems Journal, 12(5), 22-27 Kuan, Y. T. (2004). The study of resource recommendation mechanism based on learning style (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chung Yuan Christian University, Jungli, Taiwan. Lai, C.-M., Huang H.-M., Liaw S.-S., & Huang W.-W. (2009). A study of user’s acceptance on three-dimensional virtual reality applied in medical education. Bulletin of <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology, 40(3), 342-362. Lang, K. (1995, July). NewsWeeder: Learning to filter netnews. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, California, USA. Liaw, S.-S & Huang, H.-M. (2003). An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Computer in Human Behavior, 19 (6), 751-765. Liaw, S.-S, Chen, G.-D., & Huang, H.-M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computer & Education, 50(3), 950-961. Liaw, S.-S, Huang, H.-M., & Chen, G.-D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computer & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080. Liaw, S.-S. (2007). Computers and Internet as a job assisted tool: Based on the three-tier use model approach. Computer in Human Behavior, 23(1), 399-414. Moon, J. W. & Kim, Y. g. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217- 230. Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: A comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance Model. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 571–591. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models (3rd ed.). IL: Irwin. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. CA: Academic Press. 99
Ozok, A. A., Fan, Q., & Norcio, A. F. (2010). Design guideline for effective recommender system interfaces based on a usability criteria conceptual model: Results from a college student population. Behavior & Information <strong>Technology</strong>, 29(1), 57-83. Pinkerton, B. (2000). Webcrawler: Finding what people want (Doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Resnick, P. & Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58. Rucker, J., & Polanco, M. J. (1997). Siteseer: Personalized navigation for the web. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 73-76. Rushineks, A. & Rushineks, S. F. (1986) What Makes Users Happy? Communications of the ACM, 29(7), 594-598. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2000, October). Analysis of recommendation algorithms for e-commerce. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Minnesota, USA. Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. NY: Longman. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M. & Zvacek, S. (2000), Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). NY: Harper & Row. Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. NY: Wiley. Tsai, K. H., Chiu, T, K., Lee, M. C., & Wang, T. I. (2006). A learning objects recommendation model based on the preference and ontological approaches. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 36-40. Vankatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260. Wang, Y. F., Chuang, Y. L., Hsu, M. H., & Keh, H. C. (2004). A personalized recommender system for the cosmetic business. Expert Systems with Applications, 26(3), 427-434. Wei, Y. Z., Moreau L., & Jennings N. R. (2005). A Market-Based Approach to Recommender Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(3), 227-266. Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-4<strong>15</strong>. Yan, T. W., & Garcia-Molina, H. (1995). SIFT-a tool for wide-area information dissemination. Proceedings of the USENIX Technical Conference, Louisiana, USA, 177-186. Zamboni, G. (1998). Search tools (Technical report). Cordoba, Spain: University of Cordoba Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: An overview. <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology Review, 2, 173-201. 100
- Page 1 and 2:
April 2012 Volume 15 Number 2
- Page 3 and 4:
Supporting Organizations Centre for
- Page 5 and 6:
Contextualizing a MALL: Practice De
- Page 7 and 8:
Kop, R. (2012). The Unexpected Conn
- Page 9 and 10:
Human mediation and information flo
- Page 11 and 12:
elevant information based on some k
- Page 13 and 14:
of learners. A search facilitated t
- Page 15 and 16:
information as human mediation mean
- Page 17 and 18:
Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2012). How D
- Page 19 and 20:
examined whether the readiness to p
- Page 21 and 22:
Table 5 presents the ANOVA for the
- Page 23 and 24:
However, in discussing a non-sensit
- Page 25 and 26:
deviations showed smaller variance,
- Page 27 and 28:
actual participation discussing sen
- Page 29 and 30:
Mesch, G., & Elgali, Z. (2009). Soc
- Page 31 and 32:
Although prior research on overall
- Page 33 and 34:
with a score of 39 and below as “
- Page 35 and 36:
Table 2 demonstrates mean scores an
- Page 37 and 38:
Discussion Although the recent Inte
- Page 39 and 40:
Furthermore, the most preferred pla
- Page 41 and 42:
MEB. (2009). Internete erisim proje
- Page 43 and 44:
Learning Management Systems (LMS) b
- Page 45 and 46:
practice and repetition with feedba
- Page 47 and 48:
Online peer assessment Peer assessm
- Page 49 and 50:
At an international conference on m
- Page 51 and 52:
� Ability to produce rich assessm
- Page 53 and 54: Meishar-Tal, H., & Tal-Elhasid, E.
- Page 55 and 56: Tsai, S. C. (2012). Integration of
- Page 57 and 58: order to decrease text complexity a
- Page 59 and 60: matter how the learners’ aptitude
- Page 61 and 62: If compared by programs, WP student
- Page 63 and 64: mean F2F 4.64 4.52 4.35 4.44 *: p
- Page 65 and 66: een analyzed and were compared with
- Page 67 and 68: Chen, G.-D., Lee, J.-H., Wang, C.-Y
- Page 69 and 70: and diverse cognitional and emotion
- Page 71 and 72: Encourage and persuade students wit
- Page 73 and 74: Materials and procedure Each studen
- Page 75 and 76: The lower part of Figure 4 shows st
- Page 77 and 78: Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone,
- Page 79 and 80: that an item is answered correctly
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1. Relative concepts frequenc
- Page 83 and 84: The Account Management Module provi
- Page 85 and 86: Experiment 1 and results Figure 7.
- Page 87 and 88: Utilization of Test Item 36 33 30 2
- Page 89 and 90: Utilization of Test Item 36 33 30 2
- Page 91 and 92: 0.065 0.877 (17.56) 0.938 (22.55) 0
- Page 93 and 94: Hwang, G.J., Hsiao, C.L., & Tseng,
- Page 95 and 96: the diverse needs of modern industr
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 1. The framework of interdis
- Page 99 and 100: Research Design Figure 3. Recommend
- Page 101 and 102: friendly. 8. I feel the layout and
- Page 103: satisfaction, and system acceptance
- Page 107 and 108: than students in a conventional cla
- Page 109 and 110: shown in Figure 2 to include the st
- Page 111 and 112: (1996) Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (
- Page 113 and 114: Based on this connection, we consid
- Page 115 and 116: Final dominance measurements were p
- Page 117 and 118: student mood and thereby allow comp
- Page 119 and 120: Sessink, O., Beeftink, H., Tramper,
- Page 121 and 122: The rationale behind the video form
- Page 123 and 124: usefulness of the movies and their
- Page 125 and 126: case of the first two questions and
- Page 127 and 128: this paper in order to evaluate the
- Page 129 and 130: The survey questions Appendix A In
- Page 131 and 132: E-training in organizations E-train
- Page 133 and 134: efficacy regarding online training,
- Page 135 and 136: Method Sample and procedure Figure
- Page 137 and 138: 0.874 which exceeded the recommende
- Page 139 and 140: Even though the result does not con
- Page 141 and 142: Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alt
- Page 143 and 144: Wen, Y., Looi, C.-K., & Chen, W. (2
- Page 145 and 146: when they are designing and impleme
- Page 147 and 148: paper focuses on the first three st
- Page 149 and 150: their self-esteem to be partners in
- Page 151 and 152: Democratizing knowledge and symmetr
- Page 153 and 154: 1) Reading the article: At the star
- Page 155 and 156:
Effects of RCKI principle-based ped
- Page 157 and 158:
References Alexander, C. (1979). Th
- Page 159 and 160:
Valsamidis, S., Kontogiannis, S., K
- Page 161 and 162:
The Analog system (Yan et al., 1996
- Page 163 and 164:
First, the number of the sessions a
- Page 165 and 166:
BioLayout uses a modified version o
- Page 167 and 168:
As shown in figure 3, all metrics c
- Page 169 and 170:
Figure 7. The detailed results for
- Page 171 and 172:
Enright, A. J., van Dongen, S., Ouz
- Page 173 and 174:
Chu, S. K. W., Kwan, A. C. M., & Wa
- Page 175 and 176:
teachers, as well as collaboration
- Page 177 and 178:
from the students’ ratings appear
- Page 179 and 180:
Table 5 summarizes the students’
- Page 181 and 182:
eading blogs (i.e., reminders, easy
- Page 183 and 184:
Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using blogg
- Page 185 and 186:
Uzunboylu et al. (2009) examined th
- Page 187 and 188:
System implementation Overview of M
- Page 189 and 190:
Methods Before the experiment, a mo
- Page 191 and 192:
too simple, incomplete, or they eve
- Page 193 and 194:
Comparisons of UMLS Questionnaire i
- Page 195 and 196:
already described may play an impor
- Page 197 and 198:
Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., Str
- Page 199 and 200:
Avci, U., & Askar, P. (2012). The C
- Page 201 and 202:
Literature review The related varia
- Page 203 and 204:
collected through Personal Informat
- Page 205 and 206:
Self-efficacy 92 5 21 13.37 3.726 W
- Page 207 and 208:
In this problem, intention was take
- Page 209 and 210:
References Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne,
- Page 211 and 212:
Tan, T.-H., Lin, M.-S., Chu, Y.-L.,
- Page 213 and 214:
Students perused the course materia
- Page 215 and 216:
problem. All articles were then sen
- Page 217 and 218:
tests, electronic tests are more li
- Page 219 and 220:
Students 10 and 11: My classmate Ed
- Page 221 and 222:
collection was also approved by all
- Page 223 and 224:
Ubiquitous Revision Seamless Collab
- Page 225 and 226:
Tai, Y. (2012). Contextualizing a M
- Page 227 and 228:
tasks were developed from task type
- Page 229 and 230:
experiences in this phase. Moreover
- Page 231 and 232:
test is administered again right af
- Page 233 and 234:
The collected data were analyzed wi
- Page 235 and 236:
Gorp, K. V., & Bogaert, N. (2006).
- Page 237 and 238:
4PL IRT model According to the numb
- Page 239 and 240:
examinee’s ability more accuratel
- Page 241 and 242:
would be more accurate if items j+1
- Page 243 and 244:
C�I or Change I�I) would be 0.2
- Page 245 and 246:
improved by rearrangement procedure
- Page 247 and 248:
Table 6. Repeated Measures ANOVA of
- Page 249 and 250:
Leppisaari, I., & Lee, O. (2012). M
- Page 251 and 252:
Selection of the virtual tool The t
- Page 253 and 254:
Environmental themes emerged strong
- Page 255 and 256:
Visualization of text (visual langu
- Page 257 and 258:
environments where visual technolog
- Page 259 and 260:
- Logging in to learning environmen
- Page 261 and 262:
McNaught, C., Lam, P. & Lam, S.L. (
- Page 263 and 264:
on-site to finally achieve a meanin
- Page 265 and 266:
Table 1. Digital game designers and
- Page 267 and 268:
worldviews are socio-cultural-histo
- Page 269 and 270:
Phase Methods Visitor data collecti
- Page 271 and 272:
operate the game without the help o
- Page 273 and 274:
Visitors (end users) must be heard.
- Page 275 and 276:
Islas Sedano, C., Pawlowski, J., Su
- Page 277 and 278:
part of something larger than the s
- Page 279 and 280:
Previous studies have developed rel
- Page 281 and 282:
Technology Acceptance. The 10 items
- Page 283 and 284:
Table 4. Model Fit Indices Model χ
- Page 285 and 286:
In the final path model of set 1, t
- Page 287 and 288:
Discussion Differing from prior stu
- Page 289 and 290:
Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M.,
- Page 291 and 292:
Ge, Z.-G. (2012). Cyber Asynchronou
- Page 293 and 294:
college of a university situated in
- Page 295 and 296:
Table 3 shows us the following info
- Page 297 and 298:
Appendix B shows Class 1’s respon
- Page 299 and 300:
increase one’s ability to process
- Page 301 and 302:
Appendix A Responses concerning syn
- Page 303 and 304:
Shih, S.-C., Kuo, B.-C., & Liu, Y.-
- Page 305 and 306:
Adaptive U-learning Math Path Syste
- Page 307 and 308:
Figure 4. Online tutorial courses o
- Page 309 and 310:
Participants and Experimental Proce
- Page 311 and 312:
the influence of Test1 scores, an e
- Page 313 and 314:
Hall, T., & Bannon, L. (2006). Desi
- Page 315 and 316:
(Hofer & Pintrich, 1997; Liu, Lin &
- Page 317 and 318:
� Through online peer assessment,
- Page 319 and 320:
elativism.” High Internet self-ef
- Page 321 and 322:
Peng, H., Tsai, C.-C., & Wu, Y.-T.
- Page 323 and 324:
Since game-based learning has been
- Page 325 and 326:
The second reason is about the sust
- Page 327 and 328:
Methods Figure 5. Quest NPCs provid
- Page 329 and 330:
These differences indicated that pa
- Page 331 and 332:
quests further involves students’
- Page 333 and 334:
Chang, I.-H. (2012). The Effect of
- Page 335 and 336:
(1) Vision, planning and management
- Page 337 and 338:
Based on an examination of the lite
- Page 339 and 340:
Table 2. Analysis of reliability an
- Page 341 and 342:
λ10 - 0.69 0.83 ε5 14.50 * - 0.32
- Page 343 and 344:
Bailey, G. D. (1997). What technolo
- Page 345 and 346:
Stegall, P. (1998). The principal:
- Page 347 and 348:
instruction has studied the student
- Page 349 and 350:
espond and the estimation of possib
- Page 351 and 352:
Research question For the purpose o
- Page 353 and 354:
READI reliability To verify the con
- Page 355 and 356:
Physical -1.43333(*) .44699 .029 -2
- Page 357 and 358:
The results of this study suggest t
- Page 359 and 360:
Hsu, Y.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C.-
- Page 361 and 362:
domains. Five research questions we
- Page 363 and 364:
Research sample groups (4) Faculty
- Page 365 and 366:
13. Policies, Social Culture Impact
- Page 367 and 368:
Non-Specified Others Engineering &
- Page 369 and 370:
(AR = -2.1) (n = 7) 2. Non-specifie
- Page 371 and 372:
(n): Total number of articles Resea
- Page 373 and 374:
Compared to the publications in 200
- Page 375:
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPAC