Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers and Education, 56(2), 441–451. Dietz, M. E. (1998). Responses as frameworks for change. Camberwell, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education. Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Mediating the mechanisms which make collaborative learning sometimes effective. International Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Telecommunications, 1(2), 131–146. Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on <strong>Technology</strong> in Education, 35(3), 342–361. Downes, S. (2004). <strong>Educational</strong> blogging. Educause Review, 39(5), 14–26. Ducate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2005). Exploring the blogosphere: Use of web logs in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 410–421. Efimova, L. (2004). Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work: A weblog case. Proceedings of The Fifth European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (OKLC 2004). Innsbruck: Citeseer. Retrieved from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/oklc5/papers/i-2_efimova.pdf Ellison, N. B., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122. Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G.,...Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412– 433. Ferdig, R. E., & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the 'blogosphere'. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 31(7), 12–<strong>15</strong>. Fiedler, S. (2003). Personal webpublishing as a reflective conversational tool for self-organized learning. In T. N. Burg (Ed.), BlogTalks 2.0: The European Conference on Weblogs (pp. 190-216). Vienna, Austria: Cultural Research - Zentrum für Wissenschaftliche Forschung und Dienstleistung. Flatley, M. E. (2005). Blogging for enhanced teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(1), 77–80. Gleaves, A., Walker, C., & Grey, J. (2008). Using digital and paper diaries for assessment and learning purposes in higher education: A case of critical reflection or constrained compliance? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 219– 231. Glogoff, S. (2005). Instructional blogging: Promoting interactivity, student-centered learning, and peer input. Innovate, 1(5). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol1_issue5/Instructional_Blogging-__Promoting_Interactivity,_Student- Centered_Learning,_and_Peer_Input.pdf Gonczi, A. (2004). The new professional and vocational education. In G. Foley (Ed.), Dimensions of adult learning: Adult education and training in a global era (pp. 19-34). Crows Nest NSW: Allen and Unwin. Graf, N. M., & Stebnicki, M. A. (2002). Using e-mail for clinical supervision in practicum: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68(3), 41–49. Gros, B. (2001). Instructional design for computer-supported collaborative learning in primary and secondary school. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5), 439–451. Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65–74. Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337– 359. Jacobs, G. M. (2001). Providing the scaffold: A model for early childhood/primary teacher preparation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 125–130. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 31–42. Levy, M. (2009). Web 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 120–134. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>, Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62. Lloyd, S., & Bristol, S. (2006). Modeling mentorship and collaboration for BSN and MSN students in a community clinical practicum. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(4), 129–132. 177
Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 287–337. McDermott, R. (1999). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103–117. McDevitt, T. M., & Ormrod, J. E. (2002). Child development and education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall Mortensen, T., & Walker, J. (2002). Blogging thoughts: Personal publications as an online research tool. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Researching ICTs in context (pp. 249–278). Oslo: InterMedia. Murray-Harvey, R. (2001). How teacher education students cope with practicum concerns. The Teacher Educator, 37(2), 117– 133. Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41–46. Nasiopoulos, P., & Ward, R. K. (2002). Effective multi-program broadcasting of pre-recorded video using VBR MPEG-2 coding. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 48(3), 207–214. Ojala, M. (2005). Blogging for knowledge sharing, management and dissemination. Business Information Review, 22(4), 269– 276. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching in higher education. <strong>Educational</strong> Psychology, 25(6), 673–680. Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37–57. Smith, B., & MacGregor, J. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. Goodsell, M. Maher., V. Tinto, B. Smith & J. MacGregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 9–22). University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, Pennsylvania State University. Stiler, G. M., & Philleo, T. (2003). Blogging and blogspots: An alternative format for encouraging reflective practice among preservice teachers. Education 123(4), 789–797. Tan, A. (2006). Does scaffolded blogging promote preservice teacher reflection? Examining the relationships between learning tool and scaffolding in a blended learning environmen (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (3223044). Tan, J. (2010). Grounded theory in practice: Issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112. Tyran, C. K., & Shepherd, M. (2001). Collaborative technology in the classroom: A review of the GSS research and a research framework. Information <strong>Technology</strong> and Management 2(4), 395–418. Villalba, C., & Romiszowski, A. J. (2001). Current and ideal practices in designing, developing, and delivering Web-based training. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training (pp. 325–342). Englewood Cliffs NJ: <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Publications. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Boston MA: MIT Press. Weinberg, R. B. (1986). The pre-doctoral psychology internship program at the University of South Florida/Florida Mental Health Institute. Professional Practice of Psychology, 7(2), 95–101. Wells, C. G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Woo, M., Chu, S. K. W., Ho, A., & Li, X. (2011). Using a wiki to scaffold primary school students' collaborative writing. <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> and <strong>Society</strong>, 14(1), 43–54. Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> and <strong>Society</strong>, 12(2), 11–21. 178
- Page 1 and 2:
April 2012 Volume 15 Number 2
- Page 3 and 4:
Supporting Organizations Centre for
- Page 5 and 6:
Contextualizing a MALL: Practice De
- Page 7 and 8:
Kop, R. (2012). The Unexpected Conn
- Page 9 and 10:
Human mediation and information flo
- Page 11 and 12:
elevant information based on some k
- Page 13 and 14:
of learners. A search facilitated t
- Page 15 and 16:
information as human mediation mean
- Page 17 and 18:
Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2012). How D
- Page 19 and 20:
examined whether the readiness to p
- Page 21 and 22:
Table 5 presents the ANOVA for the
- Page 23 and 24:
However, in discussing a non-sensit
- Page 25 and 26:
deviations showed smaller variance,
- Page 27 and 28:
actual participation discussing sen
- Page 29 and 30:
Mesch, G., & Elgali, Z. (2009). Soc
- Page 31 and 32:
Although prior research on overall
- Page 33 and 34:
with a score of 39 and below as “
- Page 35 and 36:
Table 2 demonstrates mean scores an
- Page 37 and 38:
Discussion Although the recent Inte
- Page 39 and 40:
Furthermore, the most preferred pla
- Page 41 and 42:
MEB. (2009). Internete erisim proje
- Page 43 and 44:
Learning Management Systems (LMS) b
- Page 45 and 46:
practice and repetition with feedba
- Page 47 and 48:
Online peer assessment Peer assessm
- Page 49 and 50:
At an international conference on m
- Page 51 and 52:
� Ability to produce rich assessm
- Page 53 and 54:
Meishar-Tal, H., & Tal-Elhasid, E.
- Page 55 and 56:
Tsai, S. C. (2012). Integration of
- Page 57 and 58:
order to decrease text complexity a
- Page 59 and 60:
matter how the learners’ aptitude
- Page 61 and 62:
If compared by programs, WP student
- Page 63 and 64:
mean F2F 4.64 4.52 4.35 4.44 *: p
- Page 65 and 66:
een analyzed and were compared with
- Page 67 and 68:
Chen, G.-D., Lee, J.-H., Wang, C.-Y
- Page 69 and 70:
and diverse cognitional and emotion
- Page 71 and 72:
Encourage and persuade students wit
- Page 73 and 74:
Materials and procedure Each studen
- Page 75 and 76:
The lower part of Figure 4 shows st
- Page 77 and 78:
Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone,
- Page 79 and 80:
that an item is answered correctly
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 1. Relative concepts frequenc
- Page 83 and 84:
The Account Management Module provi
- Page 85 and 86:
Experiment 1 and results Figure 7.
- Page 87 and 88:
Utilization of Test Item 36 33 30 2
- Page 89 and 90:
Utilization of Test Item 36 33 30 2
- Page 91 and 92:
0.065 0.877 (17.56) 0.938 (22.55) 0
- Page 93 and 94:
Hwang, G.J., Hsiao, C.L., & Tseng,
- Page 95 and 96:
the diverse needs of modern industr
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 1. The framework of interdis
- Page 99 and 100:
Research Design Figure 3. Recommend
- Page 101 and 102:
friendly. 8. I feel the layout and
- Page 103 and 104:
satisfaction, and system acceptance
- Page 105 and 106:
Ozok, A. A., Fan, Q., & Norcio, A.
- Page 107 and 108:
than students in a conventional cla
- Page 109 and 110:
shown in Figure 2 to include the st
- Page 111 and 112:
(1996) Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (
- Page 113 and 114:
Based on this connection, we consid
- Page 115 and 116:
Final dominance measurements were p
- Page 117 and 118:
student mood and thereby allow comp
- Page 119 and 120:
Sessink, O., Beeftink, H., Tramper,
- Page 121 and 122:
The rationale behind the video form
- Page 123 and 124:
usefulness of the movies and their
- Page 125 and 126:
case of the first two questions and
- Page 127 and 128:
this paper in order to evaluate the
- Page 129 and 130:
The survey questions Appendix A In
- Page 131 and 132: E-training in organizations E-train
- Page 133 and 134: efficacy regarding online training,
- Page 135 and 136: Method Sample and procedure Figure
- Page 137 and 138: 0.874 which exceeded the recommende
- Page 139 and 140: Even though the result does not con
- Page 141 and 142: Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alt
- Page 143 and 144: Wen, Y., Looi, C.-K., & Chen, W. (2
- Page 145 and 146: when they are designing and impleme
- Page 147 and 148: paper focuses on the first three st
- Page 149 and 150: their self-esteem to be partners in
- Page 151 and 152: Democratizing knowledge and symmetr
- Page 153 and 154: 1) Reading the article: At the star
- Page 155 and 156: Effects of RCKI principle-based ped
- Page 157 and 158: References Alexander, C. (1979). Th
- Page 159 and 160: Valsamidis, S., Kontogiannis, S., K
- Page 161 and 162: The Analog system (Yan et al., 1996
- Page 163 and 164: First, the number of the sessions a
- Page 165 and 166: BioLayout uses a modified version o
- Page 167 and 168: As shown in figure 3, all metrics c
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 7. The detailed results for
- Page 171 and 172: Enright, A. J., van Dongen, S., Ouz
- Page 173 and 174: Chu, S. K. W., Kwan, A. C. M., & Wa
- Page 175 and 176: teachers, as well as collaboration
- Page 177 and 178: from the students’ ratings appear
- Page 179 and 180: Table 5 summarizes the students’
- Page 181: eading blogs (i.e., reminders, easy
- Page 185 and 186: Uzunboylu et al. (2009) examined th
- Page 187 and 188: System implementation Overview of M
- Page 189 and 190: Methods Before the experiment, a mo
- Page 191 and 192: too simple, incomplete, or they eve
- Page 193 and 194: Comparisons of UMLS Questionnaire i
- Page 195 and 196: already described may play an impor
- Page 197 and 198: Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., Str
- Page 199 and 200: Avci, U., & Askar, P. (2012). The C
- Page 201 and 202: Literature review The related varia
- Page 203 and 204: collected through Personal Informat
- Page 205 and 206: Self-efficacy 92 5 21 13.37 3.726 W
- Page 207 and 208: In this problem, intention was take
- Page 209 and 210: References Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne,
- Page 211 and 212: Tan, T.-H., Lin, M.-S., Chu, Y.-L.,
- Page 213 and 214: Students perused the course materia
- Page 215 and 216: problem. All articles were then sen
- Page 217 and 218: tests, electronic tests are more li
- Page 219 and 220: Students 10 and 11: My classmate Ed
- Page 221 and 222: collection was also approved by all
- Page 223 and 224: Ubiquitous Revision Seamless Collab
- Page 225 and 226: Tai, Y. (2012). Contextualizing a M
- Page 227 and 228: tasks were developed from task type
- Page 229 and 230: experiences in this phase. Moreover
- Page 231 and 232: test is administered again right af
- Page 233 and 234:
The collected data were analyzed wi
- Page 235 and 236:
Gorp, K. V., & Bogaert, N. (2006).
- Page 237 and 238:
4PL IRT model According to the numb
- Page 239 and 240:
examinee’s ability more accuratel
- Page 241 and 242:
would be more accurate if items j+1
- Page 243 and 244:
C�I or Change I�I) would be 0.2
- Page 245 and 246:
improved by rearrangement procedure
- Page 247 and 248:
Table 6. Repeated Measures ANOVA of
- Page 249 and 250:
Leppisaari, I., & Lee, O. (2012). M
- Page 251 and 252:
Selection of the virtual tool The t
- Page 253 and 254:
Environmental themes emerged strong
- Page 255 and 256:
Visualization of text (visual langu
- Page 257 and 258:
environments where visual technolog
- Page 259 and 260:
- Logging in to learning environmen
- Page 261 and 262:
McNaught, C., Lam, P. & Lam, S.L. (
- Page 263 and 264:
on-site to finally achieve a meanin
- Page 265 and 266:
Table 1. Digital game designers and
- Page 267 and 268:
worldviews are socio-cultural-histo
- Page 269 and 270:
Phase Methods Visitor data collecti
- Page 271 and 272:
operate the game without the help o
- Page 273 and 274:
Visitors (end users) must be heard.
- Page 275 and 276:
Islas Sedano, C., Pawlowski, J., Su
- Page 277 and 278:
part of something larger than the s
- Page 279 and 280:
Previous studies have developed rel
- Page 281 and 282:
Technology Acceptance. The 10 items
- Page 283 and 284:
Table 4. Model Fit Indices Model χ
- Page 285 and 286:
In the final path model of set 1, t
- Page 287 and 288:
Discussion Differing from prior stu
- Page 289 and 290:
Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M.,
- Page 291 and 292:
Ge, Z.-G. (2012). Cyber Asynchronou
- Page 293 and 294:
college of a university situated in
- Page 295 and 296:
Table 3 shows us the following info
- Page 297 and 298:
Appendix B shows Class 1’s respon
- Page 299 and 300:
increase one’s ability to process
- Page 301 and 302:
Appendix A Responses concerning syn
- Page 303 and 304:
Shih, S.-C., Kuo, B.-C., & Liu, Y.-
- Page 305 and 306:
Adaptive U-learning Math Path Syste
- Page 307 and 308:
Figure 4. Online tutorial courses o
- Page 309 and 310:
Participants and Experimental Proce
- Page 311 and 312:
the influence of Test1 scores, an e
- Page 313 and 314:
Hall, T., & Bannon, L. (2006). Desi
- Page 315 and 316:
(Hofer & Pintrich, 1997; Liu, Lin &
- Page 317 and 318:
� Through online peer assessment,
- Page 319 and 320:
elativism.” High Internet self-ef
- Page 321 and 322:
Peng, H., Tsai, C.-C., & Wu, Y.-T.
- Page 323 and 324:
Since game-based learning has been
- Page 325 and 326:
The second reason is about the sust
- Page 327 and 328:
Methods Figure 5. Quest NPCs provid
- Page 329 and 330:
These differences indicated that pa
- Page 331 and 332:
quests further involves students’
- Page 333 and 334:
Chang, I.-H. (2012). The Effect of
- Page 335 and 336:
(1) Vision, planning and management
- Page 337 and 338:
Based on an examination of the lite
- Page 339 and 340:
Table 2. Analysis of reliability an
- Page 341 and 342:
λ10 - 0.69 0.83 ε5 14.50 * - 0.32
- Page 343 and 344:
Bailey, G. D. (1997). What technolo
- Page 345 and 346:
Stegall, P. (1998). The principal:
- Page 347 and 348:
instruction has studied the student
- Page 349 and 350:
espond and the estimation of possib
- Page 351 and 352:
Research question For the purpose o
- Page 353 and 354:
READI reliability To verify the con
- Page 355 and 356:
Physical -1.43333(*) .44699 .029 -2
- Page 357 and 358:
The results of this study suggest t
- Page 359 and 360:
Hsu, Y.-C., Ho, H. N. J., Tsai, C.-
- Page 361 and 362:
domains. Five research questions we
- Page 363 and 364:
Research sample groups (4) Faculty
- Page 365 and 366:
13. Policies, Social Culture Impact
- Page 367 and 368:
Non-Specified Others Engineering &
- Page 369 and 370:
(AR = -2.1) (n = 7) 2. Non-specifie
- Page 371 and 372:
(n): Total number of articles Resea
- Page 373 and 374:
Compared to the publications in 200
- Page 375:
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPAC