05.01.2013 Views

April 2012 Volume 15 Number 2 - Educational Technology & Society

April 2012 Volume 15 Number 2 - Educational Technology & Society

April 2012 Volume 15 Number 2 - Educational Technology & Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

worldviews are socio-cultural-historically negotiated and formed through interactions (Engeström, 1987). For this<br />

reason, the views and opinions of the participants in our study helped us to understand the phenomena under<br />

investigation. A case study was used because it is an empirical investigation done in real life conditions using<br />

multiple sources of data. The qualitative data (e.g., open questions from questionnaires and informal interviews) was<br />

analyzed using content analysis, and the close-ended type of questionnaire section was analyzed using a quantitative<br />

analysis. Mixed methods were used to support a complementary view of the study (Saunders et al., 2009).<br />

Figure 2. Data collection supports two processes: understanding the needs of the Pielinen Museum and concretizing<br />

LieksaMyst as a product<br />

Data was collected from 2007 to 2010 (Figure 2). Each year’s data collection supported two processes, namely the<br />

understanding of the different context aspects relevant to the Pielinen Museum and the actual design of the<br />

application.<br />

Participants<br />

The objective was to involve all the stakeholders, which included curators, visitors, and educational technology<br />

researchers, in a common aim of developing a new application for the museum. Every stakeholder’s contribution was<br />

documented and taken into account. Due to the diverse roles of the stakeholders, their participation in the decision<br />

process differed.<br />

Visitors’ opinions and expectations are crucial to the application but their stay in the museum is temporal. Visitors<br />

also hail from different backgrounds, genders and nationalities. The sample of the 476 feedbacks gathered is<br />

described in Table 4.<br />

Curators are museum and content experts who are knowledgeable and passionate about their museum. They have<br />

resource expertise, content knowledge and are preoccupied with the learning experience of their visitors. Their<br />

contribution is fundamental to the creation of a relevant and well-structured application.<br />

<strong>Educational</strong> technology researchers supply the expertise and skills needed to bridge the gap between the curators,<br />

visitors and resources available (information, object and technology). In this case two of the experts were Finns (one<br />

native to the region) and the third Mexican.<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!