12.01.2013 Views

1 The Director of Photography – an overview

1 The Director of Photography – an overview

1 The Director of Photography – an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 Practical Cinematography<br />

camera negative. If we sample in a linear pattern, the 11-stop dynamic<br />

r<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>of</strong> a modern camera negative will need a 13-bit file to hold all<br />

that data using 0.002 intervals <strong>of</strong> density between samples.This me<strong>an</strong>s<br />

that, in order to get sufficient data for the shadows to look real, there<br />

must be 8192 options <strong>of</strong> recordable brightness for each pixel.<br />

However, if a tonal r<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>of</strong> 11 stops on the camera negative is sampled<br />

in a logarithmic way, the same amount <strong>of</strong> necessary information<br />

c<strong>an</strong> be recorded on a 10-bit file, which has only 1024 options. This<br />

me<strong>an</strong>s much smaller files are needed but the audience will still see <strong>an</strong><br />

image <strong>of</strong> equivalent quality.<br />

Image acquisition<br />

At the start <strong>of</strong> the DI process it is necessary to sc<strong>an</strong> the photographic<br />

image so that we c<strong>an</strong> write it in the binary code. <strong>The</strong> most import<strong>an</strong>t<br />

decision is what digital resolution we use <strong>an</strong>d this is described by<br />

referring to the number <strong>of</strong> pixels the horizontal width <strong>of</strong> the picture is<br />

broken up into.<strong>The</strong>re is much discussion in the post-production world<br />

as to how m<strong>an</strong>y horizontal pixels are needed, with almost as m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

opinions as there are post-production houses, so I am going to give my<br />

opinion, <strong>an</strong>d I have taken very good advice on this.<br />

A 35 mm master camera negative is almost universally agreed to have<br />

the equivalent <strong>of</strong> a digital image <strong>of</strong> 4000 pixels horizontally.<strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

if you wish to take a shot, m<strong>an</strong>ipulate it digitally <strong>an</strong>d return it to the<br />

cut camera master negative, you must sc<strong>an</strong> at 4000 pixel resolution in<br />

order that no discernible degradation in picture quality occurs when<br />

you make the photographic intermediates.<br />

If you are going to sc<strong>an</strong> your camera master <strong>an</strong>d do all your intermediates<br />

digitally, only returning to film for the release print, or at the<br />

worst the intermediate photographic negative, then sc<strong>an</strong>ning your<br />

original at 2000 pixels horizontally will be enough <strong>an</strong>d c<strong>an</strong> produce <strong>an</strong><br />

image on the cinema screen every bit as good as the purely photographic<br />

method described above.<br />

Incidentally, we refer to a picture with 4000 horizontal pixels as having<br />

a 4k resolution <strong>an</strong>d one with 2000 pixels as 2k.<br />

Why the difference? <strong>The</strong> traditional route from camera master negative<br />

to the cinema release print usually looks like this:<br />

1 Camera negative <strong>–</strong> printed to intermediate positives.<br />

2 Intermediate positive <strong>–</strong> printed to intermediate negatives.<br />

3 Intermediate negatives <strong>–</strong> printed to cinema release prints.<br />

4 Cinema release print <strong>–</strong> to cinema screen.<br />

It is <strong>an</strong> inescapable fact that every time you make a photographic copy<br />

you must lose some picture quality; therefore, if you go through this<br />

process starting with 4k camera negative you will end up on the screen<br />

with something having a poorer resolution.<br />

To satisfy the resolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> audience sitting in the optimum viewing<br />

position in a cinema, the screen picture quality must have a horizontal<br />

resolution equivalent to 1000 pixels or better. Only then will<br />

they consider the image to be sharp. In order to achieve this, one must<br />

start with a camera negative having a 4k resolution <strong>an</strong>d that will, after<br />

the degradation due to the copying process, give roughly a 1.2k image<br />

on the cinema screen <strong>an</strong>d this, therefore, satisfies the audience criteria.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!