12.01.2013 Views

1 The Director of Photography – an overview

1 The Director of Photography – an overview

1 The Director of Photography – an overview

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

178 Practical Cinematography<br />

TV<br />

1.66<br />

1.85<br />

Figure 20.3 Viewfinder with<br />

1.85:1, 1.66:1 <strong>an</strong>d TV markings<br />

Figure 20.4 1.66:1 hard mask with<br />

1.85:1 composition<br />

1.33:1 Academy Aperture<br />

1.85:1 Widescreen Aperture<br />

Figure 20.5 <strong>The</strong> 1.33:1 Academy<br />

aperture<br />

is simply the mathematical relationship between the height <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

width <strong>of</strong> the screen. It is always expressed with the height as 1.<strong>The</strong>refore,<br />

if we divide the height <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> Academy screen into its width <strong>an</strong>d express<br />

the result in decimals we get 1.33, the width being 1.33 times the<br />

height. To be correct, <strong>an</strong> aspect ratio should always be shown with the<br />

1 present <strong>an</strong>d a ratio sign between it <strong>an</strong>d the decimal, so <strong>an</strong> Academy<br />

frame becomes 1.33:1, which is said as ‘one point three three to one’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> joy <strong>of</strong> using <strong>an</strong> aspect ratio is that it matters not whether one is<br />

referring to a screen ratio or the aperture in the camera gate, the same<br />

figures will apply <strong>–</strong> so if a projectionist receives a tin marked as 1.33:1<br />

they will know exactly how to present the film <strong>an</strong>d in what format it is<br />

intended to be shown.<br />

Widescreen<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> feature films are currently shot in what is casually<br />

referred to as widescreen. This leads to some confusion as there are<br />

two, very similar, widescreen formats in use. In the USA, it is common<br />

to shoot widescreen in <strong>an</strong> aspect ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.85:1, while in mainl<strong>an</strong>d<br />

Europe 1.66:1 is more common. In Britain there is, most <strong>of</strong>ten, a typically<br />

British compromise. This entails using a 1.66:1 hard mask, the actual<br />

aperture cut into the camera gate, <strong>an</strong>d marking up the viewfinder for<br />

both 1.66:1, the outer frame, <strong>an</strong>d 1.85:1, which will be shown as two<br />

parallel lines just inside the top <strong>an</strong>d bottom <strong>of</strong> the 1.66:1 markings. As<br />

so m<strong>an</strong>y features are pre-sold to television this is good practice, as<br />

slightly more emulsion area c<strong>an</strong> be shown on television th<strong>an</strong> could be<br />

cut from the 1.85:1 ratio. This is done by taking the television tr<strong>an</strong>sfer,<br />

in 4 � 3 format, from the 1.66:1 master.A viewfinder showing all these<br />

requirements would appear as in Figure 20.3.<br />

This would tr<strong>an</strong>slate to a camera negative layout as shown in Figure<br />

20.4, where the outer rect<strong>an</strong>gle is the 1.66:1 frame <strong>an</strong>d the inner rect<strong>an</strong>gle<br />

is the 1.85:1 frame.<strong>The</strong> frame bar between the individual frames<br />

has now grown even thicker. This wastage led to experiments with<br />

three-perforation pull-down, as discussed in the following section.<br />

<strong>The</strong> area <strong>of</strong> emulsion now used by a 1.85:1 widescreen negative compared<br />

with the original full, or Silent, aperture is just 56 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

original, as shown in Figure 20.5. It says a lot for the developments in<br />

emulsion technology that, despite using <strong>an</strong> image area <strong>of</strong> just a little<br />

over half the original, we think <strong>of</strong> today’s screen images as being superb.<br />

Three-perforation pull-down<br />

Some years ago, several m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers introduced 35 mm cameras<br />

either made for, or adaptable to, a three-perforation pull-down as<br />

against the traditional four. This was because it had been noted that a<br />

1.85:1 negative picture could be accommodated in the height <strong>of</strong> three<br />

perforations if a hairline frame bar was accepted. <strong>The</strong> layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three-perforation format is shown in Figure 20.6.<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> introducing<br />

this was simply to reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> producing the master negative<br />

by 25 per cent.<br />

Despite this being a very sound idea, which the camera m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers<br />

could easily go along with, editing equipment m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!