1 The Director of Photography – an overview
1 The Director of Photography – an overview
1 The Director of Photography – an overview
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
178 Practical Cinematography<br />
TV<br />
1.66<br />
1.85<br />
Figure 20.3 Viewfinder with<br />
1.85:1, 1.66:1 <strong>an</strong>d TV markings<br />
Figure 20.4 1.66:1 hard mask with<br />
1.85:1 composition<br />
1.33:1 Academy Aperture<br />
1.85:1 Widescreen Aperture<br />
Figure 20.5 <strong>The</strong> 1.33:1 Academy<br />
aperture<br />
is simply the mathematical relationship between the height <strong>an</strong>d the<br />
width <strong>of</strong> the screen. It is always expressed with the height as 1.<strong>The</strong>refore,<br />
if we divide the height <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> Academy screen into its width <strong>an</strong>d express<br />
the result in decimals we get 1.33, the width being 1.33 times the<br />
height. To be correct, <strong>an</strong> aspect ratio should always be shown with the<br />
1 present <strong>an</strong>d a ratio sign between it <strong>an</strong>d the decimal, so <strong>an</strong> Academy<br />
frame becomes 1.33:1, which is said as ‘one point three three to one’.<br />
<strong>The</strong> joy <strong>of</strong> using <strong>an</strong> aspect ratio is that it matters not whether one is<br />
referring to a screen ratio or the aperture in the camera gate, the same<br />
figures will apply <strong>–</strong> so if a projectionist receives a tin marked as 1.33:1<br />
they will know exactly how to present the film <strong>an</strong>d in what format it is<br />
intended to be shown.<br />
Widescreen<br />
<strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> feature films are currently shot in what is casually<br />
referred to as widescreen. This leads to some confusion as there are<br />
two, very similar, widescreen formats in use. In the USA, it is common<br />
to shoot widescreen in <strong>an</strong> aspect ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.85:1, while in mainl<strong>an</strong>d<br />
Europe 1.66:1 is more common. In Britain there is, most <strong>of</strong>ten, a typically<br />
British compromise. This entails using a 1.66:1 hard mask, the actual<br />
aperture cut into the camera gate, <strong>an</strong>d marking up the viewfinder for<br />
both 1.66:1, the outer frame, <strong>an</strong>d 1.85:1, which will be shown as two<br />
parallel lines just inside the top <strong>an</strong>d bottom <strong>of</strong> the 1.66:1 markings. As<br />
so m<strong>an</strong>y features are pre-sold to television this is good practice, as<br />
slightly more emulsion area c<strong>an</strong> be shown on television th<strong>an</strong> could be<br />
cut from the 1.85:1 ratio. This is done by taking the television tr<strong>an</strong>sfer,<br />
in 4 � 3 format, from the 1.66:1 master.A viewfinder showing all these<br />
requirements would appear as in Figure 20.3.<br />
This would tr<strong>an</strong>slate to a camera negative layout as shown in Figure<br />
20.4, where the outer rect<strong>an</strong>gle is the 1.66:1 frame <strong>an</strong>d the inner rect<strong>an</strong>gle<br />
is the 1.85:1 frame.<strong>The</strong> frame bar between the individual frames<br />
has now grown even thicker. This wastage led to experiments with<br />
three-perforation pull-down, as discussed in the following section.<br />
<strong>The</strong> area <strong>of</strong> emulsion now used by a 1.85:1 widescreen negative compared<br />
with the original full, or Silent, aperture is just 56 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
original, as shown in Figure 20.5. It says a lot for the developments in<br />
emulsion technology that, despite using <strong>an</strong> image area <strong>of</strong> just a little<br />
over half the original, we think <strong>of</strong> today’s screen images as being superb.<br />
Three-perforation pull-down<br />
Some years ago, several m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers introduced 35 mm cameras<br />
either made for, or adaptable to, a three-perforation pull-down as<br />
against the traditional four. This was because it had been noted that a<br />
1.85:1 negative picture could be accommodated in the height <strong>of</strong> three<br />
perforations if a hairline frame bar was accepted. <strong>The</strong> layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />
three-perforation format is shown in Figure 20.6.<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> introducing<br />
this was simply to reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> producing the master negative<br />
by 25 per cent.<br />
Despite this being a very sound idea, which the camera m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers<br />
could easily go along with, editing equipment m<strong>an</strong>ufacturers were