1 The Director of Photography – an overview
1 The Director of Photography – an overview
1 The Director of Photography – an overview
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
54 Practical Cinematography<br />
Figure 5.4 <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> using<br />
different apertures<br />
Max Aperture<br />
T1.3<br />
Max Aperture<br />
T2<br />
Shooting<br />
Aperture<br />
T3.2<br />
on some scenes, though perhaps not on others. You have decided this<br />
because you w<strong>an</strong>t to vary the definition between scenes as part <strong>of</strong> your<br />
overall strategy for the visual pacing <strong>of</strong> the film. You will achieve the<br />
variation by the use <strong>of</strong> filters <strong>of</strong> different strengths.<br />
You might, say, look to Zeiss Super Speeds as your prime lens set.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y are truly magnificent lenses. But, if you are never going to open<br />
them up beyond T3.2, is this wise? Remember you w<strong>an</strong>t maximum<br />
definition in some scenes in order to contrast this with others.<br />
Let us compare a T1.3 lens <strong>an</strong>d a T2 lens both working at <strong>an</strong> aperture<br />
<strong>of</strong> T3.2. For simplicity, Figure 5.4 shows a single component lens,<br />
but imagine what happens in a compound retr<strong>of</strong>ocal lens containing<br />
m<strong>an</strong>y elements <strong>–</strong> things are much worse.<br />
As you c<strong>an</strong> see, when both lenses are working at <strong>an</strong> aperture <strong>of</strong> T3.2<br />
the light has to go through far more glass in the T1.3 lens th<strong>an</strong> in the T2<br />
lens. Now it should be obvious that the more glass the light has to go<br />
through, at <strong>an</strong>y given aperture, the more aberrations are likely to occur.<br />
So, why expect a T1.3 lens to give a finer picture at T3.2 th<strong>an</strong> a lens<br />
with a maximum aperture <strong>of</strong> T2? <strong>The</strong>re are strong arguments to say<br />
that it won’t.<br />
A further disadv<strong>an</strong>tage is that m<strong>an</strong>y lenses with maximum apertures<br />
<strong>of</strong> around T1.3 have minimum apertures <strong>of</strong> only T11, <strong>an</strong>d at T11<br />
they <strong>of</strong>ten perform far from their best <strong>–</strong> imagine how much glass there<br />
must be right in the centre <strong>of</strong> such a lens.A lens with a maximum aperture<br />
<strong>of</strong> T2, on the other h<strong>an</strong>d, will usually stop down to T16 or even<br />
T22 <strong>–</strong> quite <strong>an</strong> adv<strong>an</strong>tage with today’s high-speed films.<br />
Telephoto lenses<br />
With telephoto lenses all the above remains true, but you have to take<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> field into account in choosing which lens to use.<strong>The</strong>re is little<br />
point in trying to do a tricky focus pull on, say, a 300 mm lens at T2.8 if<br />
there is <strong>an</strong>y way you c<strong>an</strong> light up to T4 or better. If the shot is going to<br />
be a nightmare at T2.8, you might be better to swap to a higher speed<br />
film just for that one shot <strong>–</strong> the extra grain hardly ever shows when it<br />
is cut together. So, if you are going to try <strong>an</strong>d avoid shooting at T2.8<br />
with your 300 mm, why order such a fast lens? A 300 mm T4 lens might<br />
very well perform better at T4 th<strong>an</strong> the T2.8 lens stopped down to T4<br />
or it might not, you would need to run a test.<br />
A telephoto lens is not the same as a prime long-focus lens.Telephoto<br />
me<strong>an</strong>s the lens has been optically telescoped <strong>an</strong>d is therefore physically