Maria Knobelsdorf, University of Dortmund, Germany - Didaktik der ...
Maria Knobelsdorf, University of Dortmund, Germany - Didaktik der ...
Maria Knobelsdorf, University of Dortmund, Germany - Didaktik der ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• self-concept in science<br />
• instrumental motivation<br />
• interest in studying science<br />
They analyzed within the framework <strong>of</strong> PISA 2006 to what<br />
extent the mentioned characteristics are associated with pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
orientation. Analyzing questionnaires filled out by<br />
about 7000 grade 9 students they came to primarily the following<br />
conclusions:<br />
36.6% <strong>of</strong> the young people answering the question on their<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional expectation, expect to pursue a STEM job at<br />
age 30 (see [21], 90). In comparison with young people not<br />
wanting to enter a STEM pr<strong>of</strong>ession as adults these students<br />
can be described as having a higher self-concept in<br />
science, stronger instrumental motivation and greater interest<br />
in studying science. The expected higher degree <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
and mathematical literacy, however, can only be found<br />
in the partial sample <strong>of</strong> graduate pr<strong>of</strong>essional expectation.<br />
The girls’ self-concept in science is lower than the boys’.<br />
Furthermore those girls with a graduate STEM pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
expectation are characterized by a lower mathematical and<br />
scientific literacy as well as a lower interest in science than<br />
the boys. These results correspond with the findings <strong>of</strong> numerous<br />
other studies. In addition these girls also have a<br />
lower scientific competence than the boys. The instrumental<br />
motivation <strong>of</strong> girls with non-graduate STEM pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
expectation is significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> the boys (see<br />
[21], 95).<br />
There are correlations between the investigated students’<br />
characteristics (scientific and mathematical literacy, self-concept<br />
in science, instrumental motivation and interest in studying<br />
science).<br />
In several analyses <strong>of</strong> STEM-pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups the correlations<br />
between the investigated students’ characteristics<br />
differ according to the examined pr<strong>of</strong>essional group. In some<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups a correlation between students’ characteristics<br />
and their pr<strong>of</strong>essional expectations could not be<br />
observed. The results <strong>of</strong> the analyses show that the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
expectations <strong>of</strong> the students can only partially be<br />
explained by the theoretically deduced influencing factors <strong>of</strong><br />
the students’ choice <strong>of</strong> career.<br />
Consequently, pr<strong>of</strong>essional choice must be consi<strong>der</strong>ed as<br />
an interplay <strong>of</strong> numerous factors additionally influenced by<br />
gen<strong>der</strong>-specific mechanisms. The results are explained in<br />
detail by Taskinen, Asseburg and Walter in ([21], 90-103).<br />
According to them, instrumental motivation and interest<br />
can, among other things, affect young people’s vocational<br />
orientation. In or<strong>der</strong> to positively influence these students’<br />
characteristics teaching must be aware <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
certain conditions <strong>of</strong> the learning environment.<br />
2.2 Influence on students’ motivation and interest<br />
in learning<br />
Prenzel et al. [17] explore the question to what extent the<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> the learning environment, as perceived by the<br />
trainees, can assist or interfere with the development <strong>of</strong> selfdetermined<br />
motivation and interest. This question, along<br />
with some others, is researched in a longitudinal study which<br />
accompanied a small group <strong>of</strong> trainees (<strong>of</strong>fice administrators)<br />
in their training. Influencing factors which according<br />
to the state <strong>of</strong> research have a positive influence on the variants<br />
<strong>of</strong> self-determined motivation are assigned to six sets <strong>of</strong><br />
theoretical conditions ([17], 111):<br />
35<br />
• Contextual relevance <strong>of</strong> the learning material (e.g. references<br />
to applicability; relevance in real life; interdisciplinary<br />
approach)<br />
• Quality <strong>of</strong> instruction (e.g. precise structure; intelligibility)<br />
• Communicated interest <strong>of</strong> the lecturer (e.g. commitment;<br />
enthusiasm)<br />
• Social integration (e.g. cooperative style <strong>of</strong> working;<br />
friendly learning environment)<br />
• Support <strong>of</strong> competence (e.g. direct, pertinent and<br />
helpful feedback; individual reference standard)<br />
• Support <strong>of</strong> autonomy (e.g. <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> alternatives; scope<br />
to experiment; support in exploring, planning, acting,<br />
learning independently)<br />
These factors are also taken into account by Parchmann et<br />
al. ([16], 17) in the ChiK project (see also below, section<br />
2.4).<br />
The trainees are questioned at intervals <strong>of</strong> about two months<br />
on that particular phase <strong>of</strong> their training and on the<br />
actual last day <strong>of</strong> that particular phase. The study gives an<br />
account <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the first ten months (five measuring<br />
points). There are 18 complete data sets (see [17], 111f).<br />
The theoretically justified assumption that there are systematic<br />
connections between the conditions relevant for motivation<br />
and the variants <strong>of</strong> learning motivation are confirmed<br />
by the findings (see [17], 124).<br />
Take, for example, the variation <strong>of</strong> the motivation “interested”<br />
1 . It indicates that the six supportive conditions are<br />
positively correlated with this variation at the 0,01 level <strong>of</strong><br />
significance. The highest correlation exists with the contextual<br />
relevance and the support <strong>of</strong> autonomy (the value <strong>of</strong><br />
the coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation r = 0.62) (see [17], 118).<br />
2.3 Influence on students’ plans to take CIT<br />
Downes und Looker ([5], 179) explore the following factors<br />
that influence the participation rate in computer and<br />
information technology (CIT) subjects in senior secondary<br />
schools:<br />
• gen<strong>der</strong><br />
• parental education<br />
• access to and use <strong>of</strong> computers at home and at school<br />
• self-perceived ability in nine different IT home-related<br />
tasks<br />
• self-perceived ability in CIT subjects in school<br />
• attitudes towards CIT subjects and other school subjects<br />
(Mathematics and English) and schooling in general<br />
from which measures <strong>of</strong> “value” were constructed<br />
1 Apart from the factual incentive, the personal and general<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> the topic makes the student work hard to try<br />
and un<strong>der</strong>stand. Interested learning also means that the<br />
student wants to find out more about the topic and wants<br />
to study it (see [17], 109f).