18.01.2013 Views

Maria Knobelsdorf, University of Dortmund, Germany - Didaktik der ...

Maria Knobelsdorf, University of Dortmund, Germany - Didaktik der ...

Maria Knobelsdorf, University of Dortmund, Germany - Didaktik der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• self-concept in science<br />

• instrumental motivation<br />

• interest in studying science<br />

They analyzed within the framework <strong>of</strong> PISA 2006 to what<br />

extent the mentioned characteristics are associated with pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

orientation. Analyzing questionnaires filled out by<br />

about 7000 grade 9 students they came to primarily the following<br />

conclusions:<br />

36.6% <strong>of</strong> the young people answering the question on their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional expectation, expect to pursue a STEM job at<br />

age 30 (see [21], 90). In comparison with young people not<br />

wanting to enter a STEM pr<strong>of</strong>ession as adults these students<br />

can be described as having a higher self-concept in<br />

science, stronger instrumental motivation and greater interest<br />

in studying science. The expected higher degree <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

and mathematical literacy, however, can only be found<br />

in the partial sample <strong>of</strong> graduate pr<strong>of</strong>essional expectation.<br />

The girls’ self-concept in science is lower than the boys’.<br />

Furthermore those girls with a graduate STEM pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

expectation are characterized by a lower mathematical and<br />

scientific literacy as well as a lower interest in science than<br />

the boys. These results correspond with the findings <strong>of</strong> numerous<br />

other studies. In addition these girls also have a<br />

lower scientific competence than the boys. The instrumental<br />

motivation <strong>of</strong> girls with non-graduate STEM pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

expectation is significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong> the boys (see<br />

[21], 95).<br />

There are correlations between the investigated students’<br />

characteristics (scientific and mathematical literacy, self-concept<br />

in science, instrumental motivation and interest in studying<br />

science).<br />

In several analyses <strong>of</strong> STEM-pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups the correlations<br />

between the investigated students’ characteristics<br />

differ according to the examined pr<strong>of</strong>essional group. In some<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups a correlation between students’ characteristics<br />

and their pr<strong>of</strong>essional expectations could not be<br />

observed. The results <strong>of</strong> the analyses show that the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

expectations <strong>of</strong> the students can only partially be<br />

explained by the theoretically deduced influencing factors <strong>of</strong><br />

the students’ choice <strong>of</strong> career.<br />

Consequently, pr<strong>of</strong>essional choice must be consi<strong>der</strong>ed as<br />

an interplay <strong>of</strong> numerous factors additionally influenced by<br />

gen<strong>der</strong>-specific mechanisms. The results are explained in<br />

detail by Taskinen, Asseburg and Walter in ([21], 90-103).<br />

According to them, instrumental motivation and interest<br />

can, among other things, affect young people’s vocational<br />

orientation. In or<strong>der</strong> to positively influence these students’<br />

characteristics teaching must be aware <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

certain conditions <strong>of</strong> the learning environment.<br />

2.2 Influence on students’ motivation and interest<br />

in learning<br />

Prenzel et al. [17] explore the question to what extent the<br />

conditions <strong>of</strong> the learning environment, as perceived by the<br />

trainees, can assist or interfere with the development <strong>of</strong> selfdetermined<br />

motivation and interest. This question, along<br />

with some others, is researched in a longitudinal study which<br />

accompanied a small group <strong>of</strong> trainees (<strong>of</strong>fice administrators)<br />

in their training. Influencing factors which according<br />

to the state <strong>of</strong> research have a positive influence on the variants<br />

<strong>of</strong> self-determined motivation are assigned to six sets <strong>of</strong><br />

theoretical conditions ([17], 111):<br />

35<br />

• Contextual relevance <strong>of</strong> the learning material (e.g. references<br />

to applicability; relevance in real life; interdisciplinary<br />

approach)<br />

• Quality <strong>of</strong> instruction (e.g. precise structure; intelligibility)<br />

• Communicated interest <strong>of</strong> the lecturer (e.g. commitment;<br />

enthusiasm)<br />

• Social integration (e.g. cooperative style <strong>of</strong> working;<br />

friendly learning environment)<br />

• Support <strong>of</strong> competence (e.g. direct, pertinent and<br />

helpful feedback; individual reference standard)<br />

• Support <strong>of</strong> autonomy (e.g. <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>of</strong> alternatives; scope<br />

to experiment; support in exploring, planning, acting,<br />

learning independently)<br />

These factors are also taken into account by Parchmann et<br />

al. ([16], 17) in the ChiK project (see also below, section<br />

2.4).<br />

The trainees are questioned at intervals <strong>of</strong> about two months<br />

on that particular phase <strong>of</strong> their training and on the<br />

actual last day <strong>of</strong> that particular phase. The study gives an<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the first ten months (five measuring<br />

points). There are 18 complete data sets (see [17], 111f).<br />

The theoretically justified assumption that there are systematic<br />

connections between the conditions relevant for motivation<br />

and the variants <strong>of</strong> learning motivation are confirmed<br />

by the findings (see [17], 124).<br />

Take, for example, the variation <strong>of</strong> the motivation “interested”<br />

1 . It indicates that the six supportive conditions are<br />

positively correlated with this variation at the 0,01 level <strong>of</strong><br />

significance. The highest correlation exists with the contextual<br />

relevance and the support <strong>of</strong> autonomy (the value <strong>of</strong><br />

the coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation r = 0.62) (see [17], 118).<br />

2.3 Influence on students’ plans to take CIT<br />

Downes und Looker ([5], 179) explore the following factors<br />

that influence the participation rate in computer and<br />

information technology (CIT) subjects in senior secondary<br />

schools:<br />

• gen<strong>der</strong><br />

• parental education<br />

• access to and use <strong>of</strong> computers at home and at school<br />

• self-perceived ability in nine different IT home-related<br />

tasks<br />

• self-perceived ability in CIT subjects in school<br />

• attitudes towards CIT subjects and other school subjects<br />

(Mathematics and English) and schooling in general<br />

from which measures <strong>of</strong> “value” were constructed<br />

1 Apart from the factual incentive, the personal and general<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> the topic makes the student work hard to try<br />

and un<strong>der</strong>stand. Interested learning also means that the<br />

student wants to find out more about the topic and wants<br />

to study it (see [17], 109f).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!