Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Aims <strong>and</strong> Methodology of the Study 9<br />
in the first half of 2008, this meeting was mainly devoted to discussion of the<br />
questionnaire drafts already received.<br />
It was agreed among the group members that the new <strong>and</strong> reformed parts of<br />
the questionnaire should be tested among the experts group before a final questionnaire<br />
to be sent to all national correspondent could be designed.<br />
3.2.2 Development, distribution <strong>and</strong> evaluation of draft <strong>and</strong> subsidiary questionnaires<br />
The next meeting took place in Paris in November 2007. Ahead of the meeting, a<br />
first version of a trial questionnaire was drafted <strong>and</strong> circulated around group<br />
members. The Paris meeting was devoted to the discussion of all the new <strong>and</strong><br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed parts of the questionnaire. It was agreed that directly after the meeting,<br />
two different questionnaires should be produced <strong>and</strong> distributed to the group<br />
members:<br />
The first questionnaire was the trial 4 th edition questionnaire. This questionnaire<br />
was an exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> improved update of the older ESB questionnaires,<br />
using parts of the short 3 rd edition questionnaire <strong>and</strong> also parts of the older, but<br />
more detailed 2 nd edition questionnaire. It was agreed that this questionnaire<br />
should be sent to the group members <strong>and</strong> each should try to fill in the questionnaire<br />
for his or her respective country. The members should concentrate on definitions<br />
<strong>and</strong> data availability at this stage of the process. Data provision could<br />
therefore be restricted to one year only, even in longitudinal data tables.<br />
For certain new or improved offence definitions (bodily injury, fraud, computer<br />
offences, money laundering <strong>and</strong> corruption) additional questions were developed,<br />
aiming at definitional <strong>and</strong> data availability issues. It was clear that these additional<br />
questions could <strong>and</strong> should not be included in a final questionnaire to be<br />
sent round to all national correspondents. They would be used for the development<br />
of final definitions <strong>and</strong> for the purposes of the AGIS project. Therefore,<br />
they were compiled in a subsidiary questionnaire that had only to be filled in by<br />
the experts’ group members for their respective countries.<br />
It was agreed to finalize both questionnaires after the Paris meeting. The trial<br />
<strong>and</strong> subsidiary questionnaires were sent to all group members in December 2007.<br />
The answers received were evaluated afterwards.<br />
3.2.3 Development <strong>and</strong> distribution of the final questionnaire<br />
Based on that evaluation a new final questionnaire was proposed. There was some<br />
discussion, <strong>and</strong> then the final questionnaire was completed in March 2008 <strong>and</strong><br />
circulated among all national correspondents of the group with a deadline ending<br />
in May, allowing the group members to check the questionnaires that arrive in<br />
time ahead of the Bonn conference.<br />
This questionnaire was shorter than the trial version. Parts of the trial questionnaire<br />
that did not work well due to poor data availability were dropped from