Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16<br />
Aims <strong>and</strong> Methodology of the Study<br />
4) Additional questionnaire<br />
Albania<br />
Finl<strong>and</strong><br />
Germany<br />
Icel<strong>and</strong><br />
Pol<strong>and</strong><br />
Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />
United Kingdom: Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales<br />
Ukraine<br />
Total: 8 countries, of which 4 EU, 1 potential c<strong>and</strong>idate, 2 EFTA/EEA, 1 other<br />
European country<br />
The final questionnaires for Moldova, Romania <strong>and</strong> Slovenia were received after the<br />
end of the project phase. Therefore, it was not possible to evaluate these questionnaires<br />
for the AGIS report. They are also covered here; data on these countries<br />
are included in the 4 th edition ESB. For Luxembourg the group was not able to<br />
find a correspondent. Therefore, a questionnaire from Luxembourg was also not<br />
received during the project phase.<br />
For France, the definition parts of the questionnaire were only filled in during<br />
the trial phase. Due to some differences between the trial <strong>and</strong> final questionnaires,<br />
France is not included in the tables regarding the evaluation of definitions in the<br />
final questionnaire. However, the French responses to questions on definitions can<br />
be found in the trial parts. Regarding data availability, France was also considered<br />
in the evaluation of the final questionnaire.<br />
Since France <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s did not return the additional questionnaire,<br />
their responses from the trial phase were evaluated instead, as far as possible.<br />
Where this was not possible, data on France <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s are missing in the<br />
tables.<br />
The correspondent for Malta quit during the project phase. Time was too<br />
short to find a substitute for him. For some other Council of Europe countries<br />
the ESB group was unable to find a correspondent during the whole project phase<br />
although the group made every effort to find persons willing <strong>and</strong> able to do the<br />
task. This is true for Azerbaijan, Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina, Norway, TFYR Macedonia,<br />
Montenegro <strong>and</strong> Serbia. Also, small countries (Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino)<br />
were – like in all other ESB editions – not covered.<br />
Data in this book are mainly presented as they were in the moment the project<br />
report was sent to the European Commission (beginning of February 2009).<br />
However, in some cases further validation after January 2009 brought some<br />
changes in definitions or data availability. These changes have also been considered<br />
for this publication. Therefore, results might differ in some cases from the<br />
results in the (unpublished) original version of the AGIS report. All data have<br />
been validated. However, there are some responses from national correspondents