Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
Defining and Registering Criminal Offences and Measures - Oapen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10<br />
Aims <strong>and</strong> Methodology of the Study<br />
the questionnaire. Also, the trial questionnaire featured questions on whether the<br />
concepts presented on the include/exclude lists of the different definitions were<br />
separately identifiable in criminal law. It was decided that answers to these questions<br />
are not necessarily needed from all national correspondents <strong>and</strong> might be a<br />
burden too heavy to answer for those correspondents without a legal background.<br />
Therefore, the respective questions were dropped, too.<br />
Once again, different members of the group acted as regional coordinators for<br />
groups of national correspondents (see above). National correspondents were<br />
encouraged to contact their respective coordinator in the case of questions or<br />
problems, while the coordinators themselves contacted their correspondents in<br />
case they found problems or errors in the filled questionnaire <strong>and</strong> to clear open<br />
questions. This system once again turned out to work efficiently.<br />
3.2.4 The Bonn conference<br />
The Bonn conference took place from June 13 th to 16 th, 2008. It comprised internal<br />
ESB group sessions <strong>and</strong> “public” sessions together with all attending national<br />
correspondents. The internal sessions were mainly devoted to data evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />
production of the AGIS report <strong>and</strong> the 4 th edition of the ESB. A stronger cooperation<br />
with UNODC 23 regarding their CTS 24 was agreed upon during the meetings,<br />
too. It was decided that the group members should also fill in the parts of the<br />
initial trial questionnaire that were dropped while producing the final version. This<br />
had already been done during the trial phase for almost all countries represented<br />
within the group. However, definitions were partially changed due to the results of<br />
the trial phase. 25 Therefore, the dropped parts had to be updated, too. These updated<br />
parts of the former trial questionnaire should be compiled into an additional<br />
questionnaire after the Bonn conference <strong>and</strong> circulated among group members.<br />
The conference sessions were used for discussions with the national correspondents<br />
on the new questionnaire. The project, the changes for the 4 th edition<br />
<strong>and</strong> the motivations for these changes were explained to the correspondents. All<br />
parts of the questionnaire were addressed <strong>and</strong> problematic issues were discussed<br />
at the round table. There was also a session devoted to correspondents meeting<br />
their respective regional coordinator. There, the filled questionnaires <strong>and</strong> problems<br />
<strong>and</strong> questions related to it were discussed in detail.<br />
23 United Nations Office on Drugs <strong>and</strong> Crime, Vienna.<br />
24 United Nations Survey on Crime Trends <strong>and</strong> the Operations of <strong>Criminal</strong> Justice Systems; see<br />
www.unodc.org.<br />
25 For details, see below.