25.01.2013 Views

Role of the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 in protein degradation and ...

Role of the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 in protein degradation and ...

Role of the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 in protein degradation and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

diglyc<strong>in</strong>e-deficient mutant <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> revealed that conjugation to a substrate was<br />

not required for its <strong>degradation</strong> (Hipp, 2004). In addition, <strong>the</strong> <strong>degradation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>FAT10</strong> could be fur<strong>the</strong>r accelerated through coexpression <strong>of</strong> a non-covalent <strong>in</strong>ter-<br />

action partner, <strong>the</strong> UBL-UBA doma<strong>in</strong> prote<strong>in</strong> NUB1L (Hipp et al., 2004). Despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> strik<strong>in</strong>g similarities between <strong>ubiquit<strong>in</strong></strong>- <strong>and</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong>-mediated <strong>degradation</strong>,<br />

FATylation <strong>of</strong> a prote<strong>in</strong> appears to be sufficient to promote its <strong>degradation</strong>, as<br />

two experimental approaches demonstrated no fur<strong>the</strong>r requirement for ubiquity-<br />

lation. A mutant version <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong>, which due to a lack <strong>of</strong> lys<strong>in</strong>es is unable to<br />

serve as a substrate <strong>of</strong> <strong>ubiquit<strong>in</strong></strong> conjugation, was still able to promote <strong>the</strong> degra-<br />

dation <strong>of</strong> a model substrate. Likewise, a cell l<strong>in</strong>e carry<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>the</strong>rmolabile mutant<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major <strong>ubiquit<strong>in</strong></strong>-activat<strong>in</strong>g enzyme showed no accumulation <strong>of</strong> an artificial<br />

<strong>FAT10</strong>-conjugate (Hipp et al., 2005).<br />

Evidence for a role <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> <strong>in</strong> immunity has rema<strong>in</strong>ed sparse. In fact, <strong>the</strong> only<br />

two connections to <strong>the</strong> immune response derive from <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> gene-<br />

targeted mice, which display a hypersensitivity to LPS as <strong>the</strong>ir major phenotype<br />

to date (Canaan et al., 2006), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>FAT10</strong> might be able to <strong>in</strong>hibit<br />

hepatitis B virus expression <strong>in</strong> a hepatoblastoma cell l<strong>in</strong>e (Xiong et al., 2003).<br />

A recent number <strong>of</strong> publications have, however, implicated <strong>FAT10</strong> <strong>in</strong> cancer, al-<br />

though it is still a matter <strong>of</strong> debate whe<strong>the</strong>r it functions as a tumor suppressor or<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r an oncogene.<br />

One study found <strong>FAT10</strong> to be highly upregulated <strong>in</strong> hepatocellular carc<strong>in</strong>oma as<br />

well as o<strong>the</strong>r cancers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al tract <strong>and</strong> female reproductive sys-<br />

tem (Lee et al., 2003). Ano<strong>the</strong>r identified <strong>FAT10</strong> as a potential marker for liver<br />

preneoplasia, as it was highly overexpressed <strong>in</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> Mallory-Denk body<br />

conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g chronic liver diseases, which are thought to progress to hepatocellular<br />

carc<strong>in</strong>oma (Oliva et al., 2008). Both suggested an active role <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> <strong>in</strong> tumori-<br />

genesis based on its <strong>in</strong>teraction with <strong>the</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>dle assembly checkpo<strong>in</strong>t prote<strong>in</strong><br />

MAD2 (Liu et al., 1999). Through non-covalent <strong>in</strong>teraction, <strong>FAT10</strong> is thought to<br />

displace MAD2 from <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>etochore dur<strong>in</strong>g prometaphase, which leads to faulty<br />

chromosomal segregation <strong>and</strong> ultimately results <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> cells conta<strong>in</strong>-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g abnormal chromosome numbers (Ren et al., 2006). This hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

corroborated by <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> is cell-cyle regulated<br />

at transcript level <strong>and</strong> is kept low <strong>in</strong> G2/M phase, presumably to prevent <strong>FAT10</strong><br />

from <strong>in</strong>terfer<strong>in</strong>g with chromosomal segregation (Lim et al., 2006).<br />

Strong evidence for <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> as a tumor suppressor, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, comes from <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>FAT10</strong> is able to <strong>in</strong>duce caspase-<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!