25.01.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 4.18 shows the diurnal variation <strong>of</strong> the UHI difference between the vegetated<br />

simulations and the control simulation for the second day <strong>of</strong> the simulation. This shows<br />

peak reductions <strong>of</strong> up to 0.7 K at noon for the simulation with 30% vegetated fraction<br />

(veg2), and <strong>of</strong> over 0.3 K for the simulation with 10% vegetated fraction (veg1). There is<br />

also a smaller peak around 06:00 am. The timing <strong>of</strong> the peak agrees with Civerolo et al.<br />

(2000) who also find the largest differences occur at noon.<br />

Potential temperature difference (K)<br />

-0.1<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.3<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.5<br />

-0.6<br />

-0.7<br />

0<br />

00:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 00:00<br />

Time<br />

veg1-a01 veg2-a02<br />

Figure 4.18: Diurnal variation <strong>of</strong> the difference in potential temperature (K) between the control<br />

simulation a01 and the vegetated simulations veg1 (blue) and veg2 (pink) at x=0, y=0, z=10 m for the<br />

second day <strong>of</strong> simulation. The veg1 simulation represents an urban area with 10% vegetated fraction,<br />

and the veg2 simulation represents an urban area with 30% vegetated fraction.<br />

In order to investigate the existence <strong>of</strong> a correlation between the fraction <strong>of</strong> vegetated land<br />

cover and temperature, a further set <strong>of</strong> simulations was carried out, in which the vegetated<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!