25.01.2013 Views

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

eTheses Repository - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2.2: SWOT analysis for the METRAS mesoscale model<br />

METRAS mesoscale model<br />

Strengths Weaknesses<br />

Used for meteorological simulations in<br />

urban areas and impact <strong>of</strong> urban surface on Very simple treatment <strong>of</strong> urban surface<br />

air quality<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> a unique modelling system consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> a microscale and mesoscale model using<br />

the same code<br />

Good agreement <strong>of</strong> simulated and<br />

meteorological data for an urban<br />

agglomeration<br />

Possibility to prescribe sub grid scale land<br />

cover classes<br />

Established use in department<br />

Opportunities Threats<br />

Opportunity to develop more advanced<br />

urban surface representation<br />

Opportunity to contribute towards the<br />

METRAS model development<br />

Opportunity for integration with the<br />

microscale model and urban air quality<br />

studies<br />

Ongoing development into parallelisation<br />

and speeding up model code<br />

Relatively small number <strong>of</strong> land use classes<br />

compared to more advanced models,<br />

especially for vegetation<br />

Complex routines to assimilate land cover<br />

data and meteorological data for<br />

initialization<br />

Computationally expensive for long and<br />

complex simulations<br />

Complex code structure and differences<br />

between BEP and METRAS structures<br />

Simple shortwave and long wave radiation<br />

treatment are not compatible directly with<br />

BEP code structure<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!