29.01.2013 Views

From Page to Screen - WRAP: Warwick Research Archive Portal ...

From Page to Screen - WRAP: Warwick Research Archive Portal ...

From Page to Screen - WRAP: Warwick Research Archive Portal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

encourages readers <strong>to</strong> identify the author for each section and offers a £100 pound<br />

reward for the correct answer. Individual style was given preference over collaborative co­<br />

ordination, the individual author's realm is still very much preserved, despite the<br />

anonymity of the chapters it is assumed that the authors' voices are strong enough <strong>to</strong><br />

present themselves regardless.<br />

The collaborative project did, however, work better than the panel-discussion on TV<br />

suggests. The result is not a cacophony of competing voices, but rather a collection of<br />

distinct voices that work both with and against each other, but, despite all idiosyncrasies,<br />

never lose their overallcoherence, mainly because of the fac<strong>to</strong>rs outlined earlier (strong<br />

character, tight timeframe) and despite only very little editing by Drabble andJohnson.<br />

We as edi<strong>to</strong>rs provided the initial time scheme and main character, but we didn't do<br />

much editing afterwards. This is because we think the virtue of this novel is not in<br />

any consistency we might impose on it, but its extreme variety. Most writes have felt<br />

free <strong>to</strong> be very much themselves, though we've all been a little coloured by each other<br />

as well. Writing novels is a solitary job, and probably none ofus imagined that a great<br />

work of art would emerge from our collective efforts. But that's no reason why<br />

novelists shouldn't try <strong>to</strong> have a bit offun, and we hope (and anticipate) that readers<br />

will, tOO. 94<br />

It is interesting here that both Updike and Drabble and Johnson do not regard the<br />

results oftheir collaborative efforts as works ofgreat literary quality, but put emphasis on<br />

the fun element, describing their work as some sort ofgame.<br />

This is an attitude also shared by Dermot Bolger, initia<strong>to</strong>r, contribu<strong>to</strong>r and chief edi<strong>to</strong>r of<br />

Finbar's Hotei", a collaboration between seven Dublin writers, published by Picador in<br />

1997, who sees Finbar's Hotel predominantly "as a piece of mischief?". After Bolger's<br />

initial twenty page SYnopsis of hotel layout, his<strong>to</strong>ry and staff, each of the writers <strong>to</strong>ok it<br />

94 Drabble andJohnson, London Consequences, edi<strong>to</strong>rs note, P.5.<br />

95 Finbar's Hotel, collaborative novel by: Dermot Bolger, Roddy Dorle, Anne Enright, Hugo Hamil<strong>to</strong>n,<br />

Jennifer Johns<strong>to</strong>n, Joseph O'Connor, Colm Toibfn, devised and edited by Dermot Bolger (London;<br />

Picador, 1997).<br />

e Nicolas Wroe, "The Secret of Finbar's Hotel", The Guardian (September rzth, 1997), G2, p.6.<br />

Chapter 4 - page 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!