08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 J. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAl. FORMULATION<br />

Note the Xx{ui) message can be sent to node U, as soon as messages from all other<br />

nodes, except node Uj, have been received. Analogously %^ (j;) can be sent as soon as all<br />

messages, except that arriving from node Cj, have been received,<br />

3.3.3.6 Boundary conditioiLs and evidence nodes<br />

There are four types <strong>of</strong> nodes that are considered special cases and need to be initialized as<br />

follows:<br />

1. Root nodes: For a node X without parents, n{x) is set equal to the prior probability P{x).<br />

2. Aniicipatoiy nodes: I-or a node X without children, which has not been instantiated, X{x)<br />

is set equal to u flat disiribulion (1,1 I), so thai liel{x) is equal lo n{x).<br />

3. Evidence nodes: For a node X Ihat has been instantiated, such Ihat the /-Ih value <strong>of</strong> X is<br />

observed to be Irue. X{x) is set equal to (0 0,1,0, ...0) with 1 at the _/-lh ptisilion. This<br />

is usually referred to as hard evidence.<br />

4. Dummy nodes: A nodcX can receive virtual or judgmental evidence from a child dummy<br />

node C. In this case the X[c) and n{c) do not exist, but instead a Xc{x) message from<br />

Clo X is generated where Xc-[x") = p • P{ohsfrvalion\x). The observation can consist <strong>of</strong><br />

any probability distribution over the states <strong>of</strong> node X, and is usually referred to as s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

evidence.<br />

3.3 J.7 Example <strong>of</strong> hcliel' prupagation with diagnostic evidence<br />

When evidence occurs in the child node and propagates to the parent node, from known effects<br />

to unknown causes, this is denoted as diagnostic reasoning or bonom-up recognition. Figure 3.6<br />

shows a scenario, based on the previously described toy example, where evidence about Surfing<br />

propagates across the network, updating the beliefs in all other nodes.<br />

Note that because variables arc binary, the pwbability <strong>of</strong>X or the belief <strong>of</strong> X refer lo the proba­<br />

bility <strong>of</strong> variable X being in the true state.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!