08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.1. ANALYSIS Ob RESULTS<br />

update methods during loopy belief propagation as shown in Figure 5,2^. The different methods<br />

were explained in detail in Section 4.5.3. An initial tirsl observation is that both the upwards<br />

method, used to obtain most <strong>of</strong> the results, and the up-down method provide similar results to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the rigorously correct, but computationally expensive, compti-ie update method. This<br />

argues for the validity <strong>of</strong> these methods, suggesting that computing the beliefs <strong>of</strong> layers where<br />

no new evidence information has arrived might be redundant and not provide any significant<br />

contribution to the linal belief. However, it is likely that the differences between methods is<br />

accenluated as feedback originates from higher layers, leading lo longer internal loops. Further<br />

and more systematic research is required lo confirm the validity <strong>of</strong> these update methods.<br />

Other interesting elTects can be observed in Figure 5.29. To start with, the SI belief seems<br />

to show an oscillatory effect where the illusory contour gels narrower and wider. It would be<br />

interesting lo study in more detail whether the narrowing is a consequence <strong>of</strong> feedback disam­<br />

biguation guided by the real contours <strong>of</strong> the inpul image or an epiphenomenon derived from<br />

some other cause. Also, the up-down method S1 belief shows the cleanest response, which is<br />

consistent with the fact that it is updating the layers in Ihe expected sequence <strong>of</strong> propagation,<br />

minimizing the propagation <strong>of</strong> noisy information. According to this account, the illusory con­<br />

tour from the upwards method should be cleaner than that <strong>of</strong> the complete method, but is not.<br />

This might be a consequence <strong>of</strong> the a.symmclry <strong>of</strong> the upwards method, which gives preference<br />

lo the bollom-up evidence, as compared with the other two methods, where bottom-up and top-<br />

down evidence propagate at Ihe same rate. Again, these are jusl speculative ideas ba.sed on the<br />

limited preliminary results obtained.<br />

The results shown in Figure 5.30 demonstrate Ihe ability <strong>of</strong> the model lo feed back informaiion<br />

from the C2 layer. Using the infonnalion from Figure 5,23. an S2-C2 weight matrix was chosen<br />

to try to obtain the best reconstruction possible, although this was still I'ar from an ideal square<br />

representation. Nonetheless, the SI and Ci layer still develop activity close to the illusory<br />

contour region.<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!