08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J.I. OVERVIEW<br />

retinal stimulation (e.g. Kanizsa figures), as reported in functional magcntic resonance imaging<br />

(fMRIKMaertens el al. 2008). eleclroenceph;ilography (EEG) (Seghier and Vuilleumier 2006),<br />

magnetoencephalography (MliG) (Halgren el al. 2003) and single-cell recording (Lee 2003, Lee<br />

and Nguyen 2001) studies. The experiments show illusory contour-related activity emerging<br />

firsl in Lateral Occipital Corlcx (LOC). then in V2 and finally in VI. strongly suggesting that<br />

the response is driven by feedback (Lee and Nguyen 2(K)l, Murray et al. 2002).<br />

While there is relative agreement that feedback connections play a role in integrating global<br />

and l(K-al information from different cortical regions to generate an integrated percept (Bullier<br />

2001, Lee 2003). several differing approaches have attempted to explain the underlying mech­<br />

anisms. Generative models and the Bayesian brain hypothesis provide a framework thai can<br />

quantitatively model the interaction between prior knowledge and sensory evidence, in order to<br />

represent the physical and statistical properties <strong>of</strong> the environment. This framework provides<br />

an elegant interpretation <strong>of</strong> how bottom-up and top-down inlbmiation across different cortical<br />

regions can be combined to obtain an integrated percept.<br />

Increasing evidence supports the proposal that Bayesian inference provides a theoretical frame­<br />

work that maps well onto cortical connectivity, explains botli psychophysical and neurophysio-<br />

logical results, and can be used to build biologically plausible models <strong>of</strong>brain function (Friston<br />

and Kiebel 2009. Dayan et al. 1995. Knill and Richards 1996. Geislcr and Kerslen 2002, Ko-<br />

rding and Wolperl 2004, Yuille and Kerslen 2006. Deneve 2008a). Within this framework,<br />

Bayesian networks and belief propagation provide a rigorous mathematical implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

these principles. Belief propagation has been found to be particularly well-suited for neural im­<br />

plementation, due to its hierarchical distributed organization and homogeneous internal struc­<br />

ture and operations (George and Hawkins 2009, Lee and Mumford 2003. Rao 2006, l.itvak and<br />

Ullman 2009, Steinier el al. 2009).<br />

The present study explores the role <strong>of</strong> feedback in object perception, taking as a starting point<br />

the HMAX model, a biologically inspired hierarchical model <strong>of</strong> object recognition (Riesenhu-<br />

ber and Poggio 1999, Serre et al. 2007b). and extending il lo include feedback connectivity.<br />

By replacing the classical deterministic view with a probabilistic interpretation, a Bayesian net-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!