08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3<br />

Bayesian networks and belief propagation<br />

As described in Chapter 2, ihe classical feedforward processing model fails lo capture many<br />

observed neurophysiological phenomena, and thus is gradually being replaced by a more global<br />

and integrative approach which relies on feedback connections. However, theoretical and com­<br />

putational models stiil strive lo accommodate feedback connections and the dilTerenl observed<br />

conlexlual effect.s within a single general theorelica! framework. The probabilistic inference<br />

approach described in this chapter attempts to solve this problem. Results presented in this the­<br />

sis are based on this methodological approach, and more specifically on belief propagation in<br />

Bayesian networks. Thus, Section 3.1 <strong>of</strong>fers an introduction lo Generative models and Bayesian<br />

inference, providing the theoretical background and roots <strong>of</strong> this approach. Section 3.2 reviews<br />

evidence that supports this framework as being a good candidate for modelling the visual cor­<br />

tex. Section 3.3 dehnes and formulates mathematically both Bayesian networks and the belief<br />

propagation algorithm, and includes an illustrative example. Finally, existing theoretical and<br />

computational models based on belief propagation are described in Section 3.4.<br />

3.1 The Bayesian brain hypothesis<br />

3.1.1 Generative models<br />

It has long been appreciated that information falling on the rclina cannot be mapped unambigu­<br />

ously back onto the real-world; very different objects can give rise to similar retinal stimulation,<br />

and the same object can give rise to very different retinal images. So how can the brain perceive<br />

and understand the outside visual world based on these ambiguous two-dimensional retinal im­<br />

ages? A possible explanation comes from the generative modelling approach, which has as<br />

its goal Ihe mapping <strong>of</strong> external causes to sensory inputs. By building internal models <strong>of</strong> the<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!