08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS<br />

strong rotations the winner S3 prototype should no longer be a square object. Additionally,<br />

non-aligned inducers .should prevent or reduce the strength <strong>of</strong> the illusory contours.<br />

A dilVerent question to ihe one addressed in this section, is whether the feedback loop can<br />

improve categorization over time. Again, this can only be tested once the feedback reconstruc­<br />

tion provided by higher layers is improved. As previously argued, (he results shown in Figure<br />

5.31 suggest that feedback may indeed improve calegori/alion, based on how the CI and S2<br />

responses are gradually modulated towards a sharper square representation,<br />

6.1.2.7 Feedback to S3<br />

The example shown in Figure 5.33, despite depicting a very trivial problem, serves to illustrate<br />

the capacity <strong>of</strong> the model to simulate feedback effects, such as priming or expectation, which<br />

arise from areas outside the ventral pathway such as Ihe prefrontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, pos­<br />

terior parietal cortex or the amygdala (Sutnmerlield and Egner 2009, Bar et al. 2006, Grossberg<br />

et al. 2007, vSabatinelli et al. 200'), Gilbert and Sigman 2007). Furthermore, die model allows to<br />

simulate the activation <strong>of</strong> high-level object-selective regions due to mental imagery which has<br />

been suggested to be mediated by feedback connections from prefrontal cortex (Ishai 2010).<br />

Importantly, these effects are accommodated as part <strong>of</strong> the Bayesian network parameters (S3<br />

prior distribution), without the need to include any external artifacts. The example can also be<br />

interpreted as implementing feature attention (enhancing only slates corresponding to animals<br />

in the S3 prior distribudon) and could similarly implement spatial attention by defining a prior<br />

distribution that favours certain locations, specially when processing larger images with several<br />

objects. The Bayesian implementation <strong>of</strong> attention resembles that proposed by Chikkerur et al.<br />

(2010).<br />

6.1.3 Benefits and limitations <strong>of</strong> Bayesian networks<br />

Bayesian networks and belief propagation provide a rigorous mathematical framework, grounded<br />

in probability theory, that allows the feedforward and feedback interactions <strong>of</strong> a system to be<br />

modelled. One <strong>of</strong> its most attractive and arguably elegant features is its distributed implemen­<br />

tation, wherein all the nodes have an homogeneous internal structure and carry out the same<br />

249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!