List <strong>of</strong> references. Ahissar, M., Nahum, M., Nclken, I. & Hochstein, S. (2009). 'Reverse hierarchies and sen sory learning". Philosophical Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences .164(1515), 285-299. Alink, A., Schwiedrzik. C, M,, Kohler, A,. Singer. W. & Muckli. L. (2010), 'Stimulus pre dictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex', J. Neuwsci. 30(8), 2960-2966. Anderson, J, C. & Martin, K. A, (2006). 'Synaptic connection from cortical area v4 to v2 in macaque monkey", The Journal <strong>of</strong> Comparative Neurology 495(6). 709-721. Anderson, J. C. & Martin, K. A. C. (2009), 'The synaptic connections between cortical areas vl and v2 in macaque monkey', J. Neurosci. 29(36). 11283-11293. Andolina, 1. M., Jones. H. F,.. Wang. W. & Sillilo. A. M. (2007), 'Corlicoihalamic feedback enhances stimulus response precision in the visual system'. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences 104(3), 1685-1690. Angelucci. A. &Bullier. J.(2003), 'Reaching beyond the classical receptive field <strong>of</strong> vi neurons; horizontal or feedback axons?'. 7t>Hm(i/()//'/iy5io/og.v-Pt7ris 97(2-3), 141-154. Angelucci, A., Levitt. J. B., Walton, R. J. S.. Hupe, J. M.. Bullier, J, & Lund, J. S. (2002), 'Cir cuits for local and global signal integration in primary visual carVix", Journal <strong>of</strong> Neuroscience 22(19), 8633-8646. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S.. Ghuman. A. S.. Boshyan, J., Schmid, A. M., Dale, A. M., Hamlainen, M, S., Marinkovic, K.. Schactcr. D. L., Rosen, B. R. & Halgren, E. (2006), Top-down facilitation <strong>of</strong> visual recognition'. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> the United Stales <strong>of</strong> America 103(2). 449^54. Bayerl, P. & Neumann, H. (2(H)4), 'Disambiguating visual motion through contextual feedback modulsuon', Neural Compulalion 16(10). 2041-2066. Heal. M. (2003), Variational Algorithms for Approximate Bayesian Inference. Phd thesis, Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, <strong>University</strong> College London. Bhatt. R., Carpenter, G. & Grossbcrg, S, (2007), Texture segregation by visual cortex: Per ceptual grouping, attention, and learning, Technical Report Technical Report CAS/CNS-TR- 2006-007. Boston <strong>University</strong>. Bhhop, C. {1995), Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press. 271
Bolz, J.& Gilbert, CD. (1986), CJcncralion <strong>of</strong> end-inhibition in ihe visual cortex via interlam- inar connections', Nalure 320(6060). 362-365. Bullier, .1. (2001), 'Inlegraied model <strong>of</strong> visual processing'. Brain Research Reviews 36{2-3), 96- 107. Ciidicu. C. Kouh, M., Pasupathy. A., Connor, C. E.. Riesenhuber, M. & Poggio. T. (2007), 'A model <strong>of</strong> v4 shape selectivity and \m-d&dnce'. Journal <strong>of</strong> Neurophysiology 98(3), 1733-1750. Carandini. M., Demb, J, B.. Mante, V.. Tolhurst. D, J„ Dan, Y.. Olshausen, B. A.. Gallant, J. L. & Rust, N. C. (2005), 'Uo we know what the early visual system does?'. Journal <strong>of</strong> Neurvscience 25(46), 10577-10597. Carpenter, G. & Grossberg, S. (1987), 'A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine', Compul. Vision Graph, fmcif-c Process. 37(1). 54-115. Carpenter, G, & Grossberg, S. (1998). 'Adaptive resonance theory (art)', pp. 79-82. Chater. Courville. Kording. K. P.. Michel. Shultz, Steyvers. Tenenbauni. J., Yuille. A. & Grit- lilhs {2(H)6), '.Special issue; Probabilistic models <strong>of</strong> cognition". Trends in Cognitive Science 10(7). Chikkerur, S., Serre. T.. Tan, C. & Poggio. T. (2009), 'An integrated model <strong>of</strong> visual attention using shape-based features', Masscichust'lis InsHtule <strong>of</strong> Technology. Cambridj>e, MA. CBCI- paper 278 /MIT-CSAIL-TR 2009-029. Chikkentr, S., Serre. T.. Tan, C. & Poggio, T, (2010), "What and where: A bayesian inference theory <strong>of</strong> attention'. Vision Research In l'res.s. Corrected PrcMif. Das. B. (2004), 'Generating conditional probabilities for bayesian networks: Easing the knowl edge acquisition problem', CoRR cs.Al/0411034. Duyan. P.. Hinton, G. E., Neal, R, M. & Zemel, R. S. (1995), 'The hclmholl/ machine', Neural Compulalion 7(5), 889-904, De Meyer. K, & Spratling. M. W. (2009). 'A model <strong>of</strong> non-linear interactions between cortical top-down and horizontal connections explain,s the auentional gating <strong>of</strong> collinear facilitation'. Vision Research 49(5). 553-568. Dean. T. (2006). Scalable inference in hierarchical generative models, in ' In the Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Ninth International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics'. Deco, G. & Rolls, E. T. (2004), 'A neurodynamical cortical model <strong>of</strong> visual attention and in variant object recognition'. Vision Re.search 44(6), 621-642, 272
- Page 1 and 2:
A cortical model of object percepti
- Page 3 and 4:
A cortical model of object percepti
- Page 6 and 7:
Contents Ab.stract V AcknowlcdRcnie
- Page 8:
4.7 Original contrihutions in this
- Page 11 and 12:
3.9 Example of belief propagation i
- Page 13 and 14:
5.19 SI and CI model responses to a
- Page 15 and 16:
XVI
- Page 17 and 18:
2009 Durabernal S. Wennekers T, Den
- Page 19 and 20:
J.I. OVERVIEW retinal stimulation (
- Page 21 and 22:
J.2. MAIN CONTRfBUTlONS • A revie
- Page 23 and 24:
2,1. OBJECT RECOGNITION ihe princip
- Page 25 and 26:
2.1. OBJECT REC(JGNmON The dorsal s
- Page 27 and 28:
2.1. OBJECT RECOGNJTION properties
- Page 29 and 30:
2.1. OBJECT RECOGNITION of input em
- Page 31 and 32:
2.1. OBJEOTRBCXiGNrnON ta) u I/I ^.
- Page 33 and 34:
2.1. OBJECT RECOGNITION 2.1.2.1 HMA
- Page 35 and 36:
2.1. OBJECT RECnCNmON unit will be
- Page 37 and 38:
2.1. OBJECT REC(X}NIT!ON tivity, st
- Page 39 and 40:
2.1. OBJECT RECOGNITION response fr
- Page 41 and 42:
2.2. HSGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK feature an
- Page 43 and 44:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK Thirdly, p
- Page 45 and 46:
2.2. mCH-LBVEL FEEDBACK Kandom 2 LO
- Page 47 and 48:
1.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK « 70 U M
- Page 49 and 50:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK D Receptiv
- Page 51 and 52:
1.1. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK context of
- Page 53 and 54:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK detailed i
- Page 55 and 56:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK activity g
- Page 57 and 58:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK task, such
- Page 59 and 60:
2.2. HIGH'lM^im,_WEDBACK 2004), and
- Page 61 and 62:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK However, t
- Page 63 and 64:
2.2. HIGH-LEVEL FEEDBACK sizes that
- Page 65 and 66:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 67 and 68:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 69 and 70:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 71 and 72:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 73 and 74:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 75 and 76:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 77 and 78:
2.3. ILLUSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTOURS
- Page 79 and 80:
2.3. a.LVSORY AND OCCLUDED CONTnURS
- Page 81 and 82:
2.4. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS IN THIS
- Page 83 and 84:
3.1. THE BAYBSIAN BRAIN HYPOTHESIS
- Page 85 and 86:
XI. THEBAYESIANBRAINHYPfmBSIS poste
- Page 87 and 88:
3.1. THE BAYESJAN BRAIN HYPOmESIS T
- Page 89 and 90:
3.2. EVIDENCE FROM THE BRAIN ity in
- Page 91 and 92:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATlCACPOR
- Page 93 and 94:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 95 and 96:
XX DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FORM
- Page 97 and 98:
.1,3. DEHNITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 99 and 100:
3 J. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 101 and 102:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHFMAnCAL FOR
- Page 103 and 104:
.1.3. DERNrnON AmMAnWMATtCAL FORMUL
- Page 105 and 106:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 107 and 108:
3.5. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 109 and 110:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 111 and 112:
3.3. DEFINITION Am MATHEMATICAL FOR
- Page 113 and 114:
33. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FOR
- Page 115 and 116:
3.3. OmNmON AND MATHEMATSOALFORMVLA
- Page 117 and 118:
3.3. DEFlNmON AND MATHEMATICAL FORM
- Page 119 and 120:
3 J. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL f-
- Page 121 and 122:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FO
- Page 123 and 124:
3.3. D^JmnON AND MATHEMATICAL F0RMU
- Page 125 and 126:
.1.3. DEFI^anON AND MATHFMATICAL FO
- Page 127 and 128:
3.3. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAl. F
- Page 129 and 130:
3J. DEFINITION AND MATHEMATICAL FOR
- Page 131 and 132:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS is on models t
- Page 133 and 134:
.1.4. EXISTING MODELS Figure J. 10:
- Page 135 and 136:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS the node encod
- Page 137 and 138:
3.4. EXISTING MOOm^ Type of f>raph
- Page 139 and 140:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS The model comp
- Page 141 and 142:
X4. EXISTING MODELS ;v 1,1 gi (8>^8
- Page 143 and 144:
3A. EXISTING MODELS proposes a triv
- Page 145 and 146:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS by the higher
- Page 147 and 148:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS aleni lo findi
- Page 149 and 150:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS Model Epshtein
- Page 151 and 152:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS Fristonelal. 2
- Page 153 and 154:
3.4. EXISTING MODELS Oulgoing teedl
- Page 155 and 156:
3.5. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS IN THIS
- Page 157 and 158:
4.1 HMAX AS A BAYESIAN NETWORK 4.1
- Page 159 and 160:
4.1. HMAX AS A BAYBSIAN NETWORK ini
- Page 161 and 162:
4.1. HMAX AS A BAYESIAN NETWORK fea
- Page 163 and 164:
4.1. HMAX AS A BAYESIAN NETWORK S3
- Page 165 and 166:
4.1. HMAX AS A BAYESIAN NETWORK Nod
- Page 167 and 168:
4.2. ARCHITECTURES 4.2 Architecture
- Page 169 and 170:
4,2. ARCHITECTURES S3 C2 1 node Kj,
- Page 171 and 172:
4.2. ARCmm^TVRES S3 I C2 s f S2 o o
- Page 173 and 174:
4.2. ARCHITECTURES S4 f C3 S3 I C2
- Page 175 and 176:
4.3. LEARNING 4.3.2 S1-C1 CRTs The
- Page 177 and 178:
4.3. LEARNING Weight matrix applied
- Page 179 and 180:
4.3. LEARNING CI group -1 •B •
- Page 181 and 182:
4.3. LEARNING 2. The list of select
- Page 183 and 184:
4.3. LEARNING node=«. Therefore, t
- Page 185 and 186:
4.3. LEARNING 4.3.4 S2-C2CPTS The w
- Page 187 and 188:
4.3. WARNING 60 S3 tealures (object
- Page 189 and 190:
4.4. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING (he sim
- Page 191 and 192:
4.4. FEEDFORWARD PROCFSSING Figure
- Page 193 and 194:
4.5. FEEDBACK PROCESSING is proport
- Page 195 and 196:
4.5. F^mSACK PRCKESSING n^ (U,) i^(
- Page 197 and 198:
4.5. FEEDBACK PfiOCESSWG t.(VJ,) ji
- Page 199 and 200:
4.5. {REDBACK PROCESSING true vs. r
- Page 201 and 202:
4.5. FEEDBACK PROCES.SING 4.5.3.2 D
- Page 203 and 204:
4.5. FEEDBACK PROCESSING evidence i
- Page 205 and 206:
4.6. SUMMARY OF MODEL APPROXIMATION
- Page 207 and 208:
4.7. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS IN THIS
- Page 209 and 210:
5,1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING using t
- Page 211 and 212:
5.L FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING Slate =
- Page 213 and 214:
5.1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING 1^ Onem
- Page 215 and 216:
5.1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING j • H
- Page 217 and 218:
5.1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING 5.1.2 O
- Page 219 and 220:
5.1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING Normal
- Page 221 and 222:
5.1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING c g ra
- Page 223 and 224:
5-1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING 4 5 Non
- Page 225 and 226:
5.1. FEEDFORWARD PROCESSING 100 8 9
- Page 227 and 228:
S.i. FEEDFORWARD PnOCESSING 5.1.2.4
- Page 229 and 230:
5.2. FEEDBACK-MEDIATED ILLUSORY CON
- Page 231 and 232:
5.2. FEEDBACK MEDIATED ILLUSORY CON
- Page 233 and 234:
5.2. FEiiDBACK-MEDWTHD ILLUSORY CON
- Page 235 and 236:
5.2. FEEDBACK MEDIATED ILLUSORY CON
- Page 237 and 238: 5.2. FEEDBACK-MHDIATED ILLUSORY CON
- Page 239 and 240: 5.2. FEEDBACK'MEDIATED ILLUSORY CON
- Page 241 and 242: 5.2. FEEDBACK-MEDIATED ILLVSORY CON
- Page 243 and 244: .5.2. FEEDBACK-MEDIATED ELUSORY CON
- Page 245 and 246: 5.2. FEEDBACK-MEDIATED SILUSORY CON
- Page 247 and 248: 5.2. FEEDBACK-MEDIATED ILLUSORY CON
- Page 249 and 250: 5.4. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS IN THIS
- Page 251 and 252: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS dence and
- Page 253 and 254: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS The graph
- Page 255 and 256: 6.t. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS used 10 co
- Page 257 and 258: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RF.SULTS the image
- Page 259 and 260: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS feedback w
- Page 261 and 262: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS over lime.
- Page 263 and 264: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS 6.1.2.5 Fe
- Page 265 and 266: 6.1. ANALYSIS Ot RESULTS step. Alth
- Page 267 and 268: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS operations
- Page 269 and 270: 6.J. ANALYSIS OFRBSULTS model could
- Page 271 and 272: 6.1. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS Alternativ
- Page 273 and 274: 6.2. COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENTAL B
- Page 275 and 276: 6.3. COMPARISON WITH PRKVIOUS MODBL
- Page 277 and 278: 6.4. FUTURE WORK to temporal contex
- Page 279 and 280: 6.5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY OF CON
- Page 281 and 282: 6.5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY OF CON
- Page 283 and 284: • The HTM paliems correspond lo t
- Page 285 and 286: 268
- Page 287: 270
- Page 291 and 292: Friston, K. & Kiebel, S. (2009). 'C
- Page 293 and 294: Hoffman. K. L. & Lngothetis, N K. (
- Page 295 and 296: Lanyon. L. & Denham. S. (2(X)9), 'M
- Page 297 and 298: Murray, M. M.. Wylie. G, R., Higgin
- Page 299 and 300: Reynolds, J. H. &, Chelazzi, L. (20
- Page 301 and 302: Stanley. D. A. & Rubin, N. (2003),