08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. EXISTING MODELS<br />

e.g. 8^/(^2^') = P(x2\^]' ',y-(..-.,-t'n)- ^^ second algorithm provides a less computa­<br />

tionally demanding alternative, by choosing a value at random for each variable <strong>of</strong> the<br />

distribulion and ihcn calculating the acceptance probahiliiy <strong>of</strong> the new distribution. Both<br />

methods applied lo graphical models yield a message-passing algorithm similar to belief<br />

propagation.<br />

In importance sampling (also called panicle filtering), on the other hand, samples are<br />

chosen from a similar but simpler distribulion than the original joint probability disiri-<br />

buiion. This simpler distribulion can be obtained by simplifying the original graph, for<br />

example, by deleting edges. The .samples arc then re-weighted appropriately.<br />

• Variational approximation: Variational methods, such as the mean fie hi approximation,<br />

convert the probabilistic inference problem into an optimization problem. The basic ap­<br />

proach is to choose from a family <strong>of</strong> approximate distributions by introducing a new<br />

parameter for each node, called a variational parameter. These variational parameters<br />

are updated iteratively as to minimize the variational free energy <strong>of</strong> the system, which is<br />

equivalent to the cross-entropy (Kullback-I.eibler divergence) between the approximate<br />

and the true probability distributions. When the variational free energy is minimum, the<br />

approximate and Ihe true probabihty distributions are equivaleni. More elaborate approx­<br />

imations lo the free energy, such as the Bethe free energy, provide better approximate<br />

marginal probabilities (Jordan and Weiss 2002. Murphy 2001, Winn and Bishop 2005).<br />

This method has become more popular in recent years due to the high computational<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> sampling methods, li is currently being used by several research groups to model<br />

complex systems such as the visual system (Frision and Kiebel 2(XJ9, Hinion et al. 2006).<br />

Section 3.4.2 describes some <strong>of</strong> these models.<br />

3.4 Existing models<br />

Bayesian inference has been employed extensively to model different aspects <strong>of</strong> conical pro­<br />

cessing, from singie neuron spikes (Deneve 2005) to higher-level functions, such as object per­<br />

ception (Kersten et al. 2004) and decision making (C:hater et al. 2006). In this section, the focus<br />

11.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!