08.02.2013 Views

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

Bernal S D_2010.pdf - University of Plymouth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.1. THE BAYESJAN BRAIN HYPOmESIS<br />

These methods provide an analytical approximation to the posterior probability <strong>of</strong> intractable<br />

Bayesian inference problems.<br />

Tn summary, ihe free energy principle provides a unifying framework for Ihe Bayesian brain<br />

and predictive coding approaches, which understand the brain as an inference machine trying to<br />

oplimi/e the probabihstic representation <strong>of</strong> what caused its sensory input. As stated by Friston<br />

(2010), the theory can be implemented by many different schemes, most <strong>of</strong> which involve some<br />

form <strong>of</strong> hierarchical message passing or belief propagation among regions <strong>of</strong> the brain.<br />

The model proposed in this thesis describes such a hierarchical message passing scheme, and<br />

thus is theoretically grounded on the free energy principle and the Bayesian brain hypothe­<br />

sis. Panicuhirly. the focus <strong>of</strong> this thesis is on Bayesian networks, a type <strong>of</strong> graphical model<br />

which represents ihe causal dependencies present in generative models: and the Bayesian belief<br />

propagation algorithm, which perfonn.s inference in this type <strong>of</strong> network. A more formal defi­<br />

nition and the relevant mathematical formulation <strong>of</strong> Bayesian networks and belief propagation<br />

is included in Section 3.3.<br />

3.1.4 Origins<br />

One <strong>of</strong> ihe first people to propose formulating perception in terms <strong>of</strong> a generative model was<br />

Mumford, who based his ideas on (irenader's pattern theory and earlier suggestions by Helmholiz<br />

(Mumford 1996). Applied to visual perception, this theory states thai what we perceive is noi<br />

ihe true sensory signal, but a rational reconstruction <strong>of</strong> what the signal should be. The am­<br />

biguities present in the early stages <strong>of</strong> processing an image never become conscious because<br />

the visual system finds an explanation for every pecuHarily <strong>of</strong> the image. Pallem theory is<br />

based on the idea ihat pattern analysis requires patlem synthesis, thereby adding to the previous<br />

purely boliom-up or feedforward structure a top-down or feedback process in which the signal<br />

or pattern is reconstructed.<br />

The Helmholtz machine (Dayan el al. I99.'i) extended these ideas by implementing inferential<br />

priors using feedback. Here, the generative and recognition models were both implemented<br />

as slruclured networks whose parameters had to be learned. The connectivity <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

is based on the hierarchical lop-down and botiom-up connections in the cortex. This layered<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!