11.02.2013 Views

Here - Tilburg University

Here - Tilburg University

Here - Tilburg University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Author and presenter<br />

Koppenol-Gonzalez, Gabriela; Dept. Methodology and Statistics, <strong>Tilburg</strong><br />

School of Social and Behavioral Sciences<br />

Title<br />

Latent Class Analysis:<br />

Understanding planning ability measured by the Tower of London:<br />

Identifying and characterizing cognitive strategies.<br />

Abstract<br />

The Tower of London (TOL) is a widely used instrument for assessing<br />

planning ability. People may adopt different strategies when confronted with a<br />

TOL problem. For instance, some people try to solve the problems by adopting a<br />

trial-and-error strategy, whereas others try to look ahead and think through<br />

every move before actually making the first one. It is obvious that some<br />

cognitive strategies are more efficient than others and that strategy<br />

effectiveness may interact with specific properties of given problems to be<br />

solved.<br />

TOL problem properties are directly observable, yet the cognitive strategy<br />

that people use to solve the problems are not. Hence to study this, a technique<br />

is needed that indirectly infers these cognitive strategies based upon the<br />

available data. In this study, latent class analysis was used to identify and<br />

characterize the most prominent cognitive strategies used when solving TOL-<br />

problems.<br />

The results suggest that four strategy groups can be distinguished which differ<br />

with respect to preplanning time, effects of problem properties on performance<br />

and overall performance. The findings offer an explanation for inconsistent<br />

findings in the literature on the relation between TOL problem solving and<br />

cognitive inhibition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!