11.02.2013 Views

Here - Tilburg University

Here - Tilburg University

Here - Tilburg University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Presenter<br />

Busse, Britta; Darmstadt <strong>University</strong> of Technology<br />

Authors<br />

Marek Fuchs; Britta Busse; Darmstadt <strong>University</strong> of Technology<br />

Title<br />

Using an adaptive design in gaining cooperation. Enhancing the recruitment<br />

success in a mobile phone panel survey<br />

Abstract<br />

In recent years declining response and cooperation rates have become a<br />

serious threat to all kinds of surveys. This implies one, reduced sample sizes and<br />

therefore inflating standard errors and decreasing accuracy of survey results,<br />

and two, a potential increase of non-response biases since the population of<br />

survey respondents might differ significantly from the non-responding<br />

population. Both effects have especially severe consequences for panel surveys<br />

since panel studies require large initial samples due to panel attrition (which<br />

reduces sample size in addition to initial non-response). Also, non-response<br />

biases that might be introduced into the panel will be carried on into every<br />

following panel wave. Thus, when recruiting for a panel survey it is necessary to<br />

avoid initial refusals and increase cooperation with the help of an effective<br />

recruitment question wording. A common practice used in the initial phase of<br />

telephone interviews in order to gain cooperation allays respondents’ concerns<br />

with an appropriate interviewer statement addressing the respondents’ qualms.<br />

We propose that – similar to these proactive interviewer persuasion statements<br />

in the beginning of telephone interviews - a respondent-tailored conviction<br />

strategy could enhance the success of a panel recruitment question. In practice<br />

this could be implemented by differential recruitment question versions among<br />

which the most promising one will be presented to the respondent, chosen based<br />

on questions already answered by the respondent like survey attitudes items.<br />

In this paper we will present results from a recruitment survey (n=1,600)<br />

conducted in Germany for refreshing an ongoing mobile phone panel. We tested<br />

four different recruitment question versions in a randomized between-subjects

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!