Here - Tilburg University
Here - Tilburg University
Here - Tilburg University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Presenter<br />
Beuckelaer De, Alain; Radboud <strong>University</strong> Nijmegen<br />
Authors<br />
Nele Libbrecht; Ghent <strong>University</strong><br />
Alain De Beuckelaer; Ghent <strong>University</strong>, Belgium; Renmin <strong>University</strong> China, P.R.<br />
China; and Radboud <strong>University</strong> Nijmegen<br />
Filip Lievens; Ghent <strong>University</strong><br />
Thomas Rockstuhl; Nanyang Business School<br />
Title<br />
Measurement Invariance of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale<br />
Scores: Does the Measurement Structure Hold Across Far Eastern and European<br />
Countries?<br />
Abstract<br />
In recent years, emotional intelligence and emotional intelligence<br />
measures have been widely examined in a plethora of countries and cultures.<br />
This is also the case for the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS),<br />
prompting the importance of examining whether the WLEIS is invariant across<br />
regions other than the Far Eastern region (China) where it was originally<br />
developed. This study investigated the measurement invariance of the WLEIS<br />
scores across two countries, namely Singapore (N = 505) and Belgium (N =<br />
339). Results showed that the measurement structure underlying the WLEIS<br />
ratings was invariant across these different countries as there was no departure<br />
from measurement invariance in terms of factor form, factor pattern coefficients,<br />
and factor intercorrelations. The scalar invariance model was partially supported.<br />
These results show promise for the equivalence of the WLEIS scores across<br />
different countries. Future research is needed to further test the equivalence<br />
across other countries and samples.