03.09.2014 Views

Crise Ambiental e Modernidade - Instituto de Psicologia da UFRJ

Crise Ambiental e Modernidade - Instituto de Psicologia da UFRJ

Crise Ambiental e Modernidade - Instituto de Psicologia da UFRJ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

Abstract<br />

Nowa<strong>da</strong>ys, the global environment crisis imposes chalenges to science and politics<br />

simultaneously. The politicians, used to humans subjects, find themselves obliged to<br />

inclu<strong>de</strong> the environment in their <strong>de</strong>cisions, while science moves from the labs to public<br />

<strong>de</strong>bates about impredictable objects and ambiguous issues, such as the global climatic heat.<br />

Both <strong>de</strong>mands done to science and politics come from a structural change in the civilizing<br />

process. This process was represented by mo<strong>de</strong>rnity as a man’s control over nature,<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red a wild and exterior space. To<strong>da</strong>y, this scene is the oppositive: the preservation<br />

of the environment causes struggles among the men. This change of nature from an exterior<br />

place to the interior of society, as it presents itself as a distance from mo<strong>de</strong>rnity, is the<br />

subject of this work. Such process will be investigated un<strong>de</strong>r three points. At first, we try to<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstand the emergence of the environment crisis from the engine of the mo<strong>de</strong>rnity<br />

itself. Therefore, the mo<strong>de</strong>rn features treated in the first chapter ⎯ nature exteriority, future<br />

previsibility and criticism ⎯ are taken back in the second chapter, as their consequent<br />

process. This move leads to socialization of nature, manufacturing of risks, and to extension<br />

of criticism, elements that insert the environment crisis in the present. Then, two<br />

antagonized ways of setings the environment problems are analysed. These two ways share<br />

the fact of not taking into account the fusion between nature and society: the <strong>de</strong>ep ecology<br />

and the mo<strong>de</strong>rnizing perspective. At last, the conceptual implications of the hybridization<br />

between nature and society on History, science and culture are studied.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!