HANSA 02-2019
Nord-Ostsee-Kanal | MSC Zoe | Reefer-Report | Nordfrost | MacGregor | Neues Bergungsmanöver | Ships made in Germany 2018 | Havarien & Brandschutz | Rudolf A. Oetker
Nord-Ostsee-Kanal | MSC Zoe | Reefer-Report | Nordfrost | MacGregor | Neues Bergungsmanöver | Ships made in Germany 2018 | Havarien & Brandschutz | Rudolf A. Oetker
Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.
YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.
Schifffahrt | Shipping<br />
© Campbell Johnston<br />
icy to their underwriters for consideration<br />
and notify their P&I insurers but the<br />
hull underwriters need a little time to assess<br />
whether or not the vessel is actually<br />
a constructive total loss. In the meantime,<br />
the salvage contract continues to<br />
run and SCOPIC increases on a daily basis.<br />
Ultimately, though they also have to<br />
accept that notice will be given by P&I<br />
of five days to terminate SCOPIC or the<br />
possibility that the salvage contract itself<br />
can come to an end as there is no prospect<br />
of successfully salving the property<br />
with value. Local authorities may,<br />
however, insist that the LOF contract remains<br />
in place and salvors need to ensure<br />
that they have good dialogue with<br />
the owners, hull underwriters and particularly<br />
the P&I insurers to constantly<br />
assess costs and progress generally, plus<br />
what spread of equipment should remain<br />
on site.<br />
In our scenario, after a period of a week<br />
or so, the underwriters accept that the<br />
vessel is a constructive total loss under<br />
the hull policy and agree to pay her hull<br />
insurance value to the owners.<br />
With a total loss now agreed with the<br />
hull underwriters, the P&I club will now<br />
want to take a very active role in terms of<br />
wreck removal and also want to discuss<br />
with the salvor bringing the LOF contract<br />
and SCOPIC to an end and move<br />
»Everybody wants results<br />
and it is disappointing for a salvor who has<br />
secured an LOF contract to find that that contract<br />
comes to an end as a result of bad weather«<br />
towards a wreck removal. A salvor who<br />
has been involved in the project does<br />
have a slight advantage over other potential<br />
bidders for a wreck removal contract<br />
and the P&I club will be well aware<br />
of this.<br />
Familiarity with the status of the casualty<br />
and having equipment already mobilised<br />
and on site can result in a financial<br />
saving for P&I insurers funding the<br />
wreck removal. The key therefore for any<br />
salvor and any sub-contractors is to ensure<br />
that throughout the operation there<br />
is full and proper dialogue with the<br />
owners and their insurers. And to anticipate<br />
likely scenarios and work to them<br />
in terms of offering alternative services<br />
with a view to keeping outlay down but<br />
also ensuring that, sufficient equipment<br />
Alistair Johnston<br />
etc is there and on site in the event that<br />
a decision is promptly made for a wreck<br />
removal.<br />
Everybody wants results and obviously<br />
it is always disappointing for a salvor<br />
who has secured an LOF contract to find<br />
that that contract comes to an end as a<br />
result of bad weather etc causing further<br />
damage to a vessel unexpectedly. That is<br />
one of the risks but salvors will look to<br />
counter the financial impact of this and<br />
endeavour to use the advantages that they<br />
have in terms of being on site to their advantage.<br />
Author:<br />
Alistair Johnston<br />
Director, Campbell Johnston Clark<br />
WELTWEIT<br />
IM EINSATZ<br />
ZÖLLNER Signal GmbH | signal@zoellner.de | zoellner.de<br />
<strong>HANSA</strong> International Maritime Journal – 156. Jahrgang – <strong>2019</strong> – Nr. 2 37