Swiss Medical Informatics SMI 69 - SGMI

2 Institute of Medicine, Keeping Patients Safe. 2004, Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
3 Keenan G, Tschannen D, Wesley ML. Standardized nursing teminologies
can transform practice. Jona. 2008;38(3):103–6.
4 Müller-Staub M. Preparing nurses to use standardizednursinglanguage
in the electronic health record. Studies in health technology and informatics:
Connecting Health and Humans. 2009;146:337–41.
5 Burri B, Odenbreit M, Schärer S. Elekronische Pflegedokumentation:
Zum Papier zurükkehren möchte niemand. Krankenpflege. 2010;
103(4):16–8.
6 Müller-Staub M. Förderung der Pflegediagnostik und ihr Beitrag zu patientenorientierten
Kostenmodellen, in Handbuch Gesundheitswesen
Schweiz im Umbruch, W.Oggier, etal., Editors. 2008, Trend Care AG,
eHealthCare.ch: Sursee. p. 1–8.
7 Müller-Staub M, Reithmayer A, Hofstetter D. DRG –Pflegediagnosenals
Chance. Krankenpflege. 2009;102(11):18–21.
8 Odenbreit M. Electronically supported nursing documentation. in Nanda
International 2008 Conference: Capturing the expert knowledge of
nursing. 2008. Miami: NANDA International.
9 Odenbreit M. Pflegeleistungund DRG: Sichtbar durchPflegediagnosen?,
in DRG und elektronische Pflegedokumentation: Risiken und Chancen.
2010, Pflege PBS: Basel.
10 Müller-Staub M. Evaluation ofthe implementation of nursing diagnostics,
in Medical Sciences, Department of Quality Care Research. 2007,
Radboud University: Nijmegen. p. 175.
11 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Levels of evidence and
grades of recommendation. [cited 12/12/2005]; Available from:
www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp≠levels.
PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL MEETING 2010
12 Björvell C, Wredling R, Thorell-Ekstrand I. Long-term increase in quality
of nursing documentation: Effects of acomprehensive intervention.
Scand JCaring Sci. 2002;16:34–42.
13 Carlson-Catalano J. Eine Lehrmethode zurEntwicklung diagnostischer
Fähigkeiten, in Arbeitsbuch Pflegediagnostik: Pflegerische Entscheidungsfindung,
kritisches Denken und diagnostischer Prozess –Fallstudien
und Analysen, M. Lunney, J.Georg, and M. Müller Staub, Editors.
2007, Huber: Bern. p. 75–98.
14 Florin J, Ehrenberg A,Ehnfors M.Measuring the quality of nursing
diagnoses, in ACENDIO 2005, N. Oud, Editor. 2005, Huber: Bern.
15 Müller-Staub M.Qualitätserhöhung durch Pflegediagnosen? Unterricht
Pflege. 2009;14(1):20–2.
16 Müller-Staub M, et al. Improved quality of nursing documentation: Results
of anursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes implementation
study. Int JNurs Termin Classific. 2007;18(1):5–17.
17 Müller-Staub M, et al. Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively:
cluster randomized trial. JAdv Nurs. 2008;63(3):291–301.
18 Florin J, Ehrenberg A,Ehnfors M.Quality of nursing diagnoses: evaluation
of an educational intervention. Int J Nurs Terminol Classific.
2005;16(2):33–43.
19 Anderson CA, Keenan G, Jones J. Using bibliometrics to support your
selection ofanursing terminology set. CIN: Computers, Informatics,
Nursing. 2009;27(2):82–90.
20 Welton JM, Halloran EJ. Nursing diagnoses, diagnosis-related group,
and hospital outcomes. JNurs Admin. 2005;35(12):541–9.
Swiss Medical Informatics 2010; n o 69
29