21.02.2013 Views

Vol :37 Issue No.1 2012 - Open House International

Vol :37 Issue No.1 2012 - Open House International

Vol :37 Issue No.1 2012 - Open House International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2. Correspondence between satisfaction level and renovation done<br />

mean satisfaction level was low at 2.2 with a vast<br />

majority (86.5%) of the owners indicating dissatisfaction<br />

(rating 1 or 2) as against only 8.1% indicating<br />

high satisfaction (rating 4 or 5). The results were<br />

very similar for Kuala Trengganu where the mean<br />

satisfaction level was at 2.1 with 93.5% of owners<br />

rating dissatisfied, but were markedly different for<br />

Shah Alam and Kota Kemuning where only 38.3%<br />

and 30.2% rated dissatisfied respectively with the<br />

corresponding mean scores of 3.06 and 3.32.<br />

Thus there is reason to believe that the eastern can<br />

be distinguished from the western region on the<br />

basis of the satisfaction levels of house buyers.<br />

It would be reasonable to surmise that owners<br />

would react rather predictively according to their<br />

satisfaction or lack of it and that the nature of their<br />

reaction would influence their decisions or actions<br />

in terms of renovation initiatives. If this presumption<br />

is correct, the inclination to renovate is expected to<br />

be greater among the dissatisfied owners than the<br />

satisfied owners; as a corollary, more of dissatisfied<br />

owners and less of satisfied owners would engage<br />

in makeover initiative. However, when the data was<br />

subjected to Chi-square significance test (as illustrated<br />

in Table 2), no evidence is found of such<br />

association at α = 0.05 level of significance. This<br />

implies lack of association between owners’ satisfaction<br />

level and their makeover initiative. In fact,<br />

the samples in combination produced a test value<br />

just outside the significance level (at α = 0.055)<br />

with the individual data for Shah Alam, Kemuning<br />

and Kuala Trengganu producing values even further<br />

outside . These results are interesting for their<br />

lack of intuitive appeal. Only Kota Bharu showed a<br />

semblance of the expected behaviour where the<br />

existence of an association between satisfaction<br />

level and the makeover initiative was indicated.<br />

Next the data on dissatisfied owners was<br />

examined for possible link between owners’ dissatisfaction<br />

and reaction to the dissatisfaction in terms<br />

of makeover initiatives. As expected, the link was<br />

very strong for all the four locations with dissatisfied<br />

owners either already having had alteration jobs<br />

done or had committed to one for the near future;<br />

none indicated that they would not do anything<br />

about it. In Kota Bharu, all but one dissatisfied owners<br />

performed makeover exercises at some point<br />

after acquiring their properties; even the single<br />

exception indicated an intention to perform the<br />

same in the near future. For Kuala Trengganu, the<br />

proportion of dissatisfied owners who had renovated<br />

was 93.1% while the remaining 6.9% would follow<br />

soon. In Shah Alam, the corresponding proportion<br />

was 88.9% with the remaining 11.1% indicating<br />

their plan to renovate immediately.<br />

Kemuning had the lowest percentage of its dissatisfied<br />

owners performing renovation. Even so, the<br />

percentage was high at 84.6% with the remaining<br />

15.4% all indicating their intention to renovate in<br />

the near future.<br />

However, when responses from the satisfied<br />

owners (scores of 4 or 5) were analysed, the findings<br />

became of interest because of some unexpected<br />

results they produced. In particular, they showed<br />

that makeover activities were high even among this<br />

group and almost matched those of the dissatisfied<br />

owners. Taking all the samples together, the proportion<br />

of satisfied owners who engaged in<br />

makeover was 74.0% while the results for the individual<br />

locations were 100% for Kuala Trengganu,<br />

81% for Shah Alam and 70.8% for Kemuning.<br />

Only Kota Bharu was an exception with a much<br />

lower renovation rate of 33.3%, which relates<br />

closely to what is expected. It ought to be noted<br />

though that the sample sizes for Kuala Trengganu<br />

and Kota Bharu are probably too small for conclusiveness<br />

(see Table 3). Nonetheless, together with<br />

the findings of insignificance earlier, these results<br />

make evident the fact that satisfaction level may not<br />

be the only factor in owners’ decision to renovate.<br />

In a way, these results also accounted for why lack<br />

of association was found earlier between satisfac-<br />

2 1<br />

open house international <strong>Vol</strong>.<strong>37</strong> <strong>No.1</strong>, March <strong>2012</strong> Examining The Potential For Mass Customisation... Md. Nasir Daud, Hasniyati Hamzah and Yasmin Mohd Adnan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!