Vol :37 Issue No.1 2012 - Open House International

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Nese Dikmen, Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan, Colin Davidson open house international Vol.37 No.1, March 2012 Comparison Of Post-Disaster Housing... regard to the location and design of the project • Consider the climate and topography of the project location in the architectural design as well as in the site layout • Ensure the continuity of cultural and historical heritage of the area and its people. In the case of a bottom-up approach, following additional precautions are recommended: • Provide technical assistance to the beneficiary and not just check the progress of the construction works to release payments • Either provide the construction material as part of the aid or help establish a building materials outlet in the village that carries standard quality material and fittings • Assess the skills and abilities of the beneficiaries and provide on-site training to those who can take part in the management or construction teams with a little guidance. • Encourage active participation of the beneficiaries in all stages of the building work to ensure financial and psychological benefits. • Provide extra funding to counter price hikes due to inflation. R EF ERENCES http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disaster, accessed on 15.0.2011 BARAKAT S. 2003, Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster, Humanitarian Practice Network, O.D.I. Network Paper 43. Humanitarian Practice Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, www.odihpn.org. BARENSTEIN J.D. 2006, Housing reconstruction in post-earthquake Gujarat: a comparative analysis, Paper No. 54, Humanitarian Practice Network, Overseas Development Institute, London, www.odihpn.org. CHOULARTON R. 2001, Complex learning: organizational learning from disasters,Safety Science 39 pp. 61–70. CHOWDHURY, Md. M. R. 2011, Bridging the public-private partnership in disaster management in Bangladesh, DeMond Shondell Miller and Jason David Rivera (Eds.), Community Disaster Recovery and Resiliency Exploring Global 3 8 Opportunities and Challenges, London: Taylor & Francis. CORBACIOGLU S. 2006, Organizational Learning and self- adaptation in dynamic disaster environments, Disasters 30 (2) pp. 212-233. DAVIDSON C. 2010, Multi-actor arrangements and project management, in: G. Lizarralde, C. Johnson, C. Davidson (Eds), Rebuilding after Disasters From Emergency to Sustainability, London, Taylor & Francis. DEMIRTAS R. IRAVUL Y. ERKMEN C. BARAN B. YAMAN M. BAYKAL M. and KILIC T. 2000, June 2000 Orta (Çankırı) Earthquake Report, General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Ankara. DIKMEN N. 2010, User Requirements and Responsible Reconstruction, Gonzalo Lizarralde, Cassidy Johnson, Colin Davidson (Eds.), Rebuilding after Disasters from Emergency to Sustainability, London: Taylor & Francis. EL-MASRI S. and KELLETT P. 2001, Post-war reconstruction. Participatory approaches to rebuilding the damaged villages of Lebanon: a case study of al-Burjain, Habitat International, 25. GANAPATI, E. N. and GANAPATI, S. 2009, Enabling participatory planning after disasters: a case study of the World Bank’s housing reconstruction in Turkey, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75:1, 41-59. GHARAATI M. and DAVIDSON C. 2008, Who Knows Best? An Overview of Reconstruction after the Earthquake in Bam, Iran, Proceedings, i-Rec 2008, available at http://www.resorgs.org.nz/irec2008/i-rec2008_papers.shtml. GONZALES, C. 2011, Opportunities and Challenges for housing and housing policy, DeMond Shondell Miller and Jason David Rivera (Eds.), Community Disaster Recovery and Resiliency Exploring Global Opportunities and Challenges, London: Taylor & Francis. HOARD M., HOMER J., MANLEY W., FURBEE P., HAQUE A. and HELMKAMP J. 2005, Systems modeling in support of evidence-based disaster planning for rural areas, Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 208.
JOHNSON C. 2007, Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey, Habitat International 31 (2007) pp.36–52. LAWTHER P.M. 2009, Community involvement in post disaster re-construction- case study of the British red cross Maldives recovery program, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, June. LIZARRALDE G., JOHNSON C. and DAVIDSON C. 2010, Rebuilding after Disasters, in: G. Lizarralde, C. Johnson, C. Davidson (Eds) Rebuilding after Disasters From Emergency to Sustainability, London, Taylor & Francis. LYONS M. 2009, Building Back Better: The Large-Scale Impact of Small-Scale Approaches to Reconstruction, World Development 37 (2). MASURIER, J.L., WILKINSON, S. and SHESTAKOVA, Y. 2006, An analysis of the alliancing procurement method for reconstruction following an earthquake, Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, April 18-22, San Francisco, California, USA. MILLER, D.S. and RIVERA, J. D. 2011, Introduction: the unique opportunities and challenges from a social scientific perspec- tive,DeMond Shondell Miller and Jason David Rivera (Eds.), Community Disaster Recovery and Resiliency Exploring Global Opportunities and Challenges, London: Taylor & Francis. REGULATIONS ON ALLOCATION OF POST-DISASTER REBUILDING FUNDS TO DISASTER VICTIMS (Afetler Fonunun Harcama Usullerine İlişkin Yönetmelik), Official gazette date: 12/06/1970, No: 13517. REPUBLIC OF TURKEY (2008), Turkish Republic Country Report On Disaster Management 2008; http://www.preven- tionweb.net/files/8359_8359TurkeyDRM2008.pdf ROSENBERG, J. 2011, Natural disasters, climate change, and recovery: the sustainability question in Post-Ivan Grenada, DeMond Shondell Miller and Jason David Rivera (Eds.), Community Disaster Recovery and Resiliency Exploring Global Opportunities and Challenges, London: Taylor & Francis. RUDMAN, W.B., CLARKE, R.A., METZL, J.F., 2003, Emergency responders: Drastically Underfunded, Dangerously Unprepared. Council on Foreign Relations, New York. Available at: http://www.cfr.org/pdf/Responders_TF.pdf. TAS N., COSGUN N. and TAS M. 2007, IA qualitative evaluation of the after earthquake permanent housings in Turkey in terms of user satisfaction—Kocaeli, Gundogdu Permanent Housing model, Building and Environment 42. T.C. BAYINDIRLIK VE ISKAN BAKANLIGI (1984), Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Proje ve Plan Daire Başkanlığı, ‘Bölgesel Afet Tip konutları’, Ankara. T.C. SAYISTAY BASKANLIGI (2003) Bayindir ve Iskan Bakanliginin Marmara ve Duzce depremleri sonrasi faaliyetleri Raporu. http://www.sayistay.gov.tr UNISDR Terminology on disaster risk reduction, 2009. WEEKS M.R. 2007, Organizing for disaster: Lessons from the military,Business Horizons 50. Author’s Address: Nese Dikmen a, b, * , Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan c , Colin Davidson a aIF Research Group, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128 Main Post Office, Montreal, Quebec H3C3J7, Canada bDepartment of Architecture, Suleyman Demirel University, 32260, Isparta, Turkey cDepartment of Architecture, Middle East Technical University, 06531, Ankara, Turkey * Corresponding author 3 9 open house international Vol.37 No.1, March 2012 Comparison Of Post-Disaster Housing... Nese Dikmen, Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan, Colin Davidson
Page 1 and 2: open house international w w w . o
Page 3 and 4: Contents o pe n ho use inte rnat io
Page 5 and 6: Previous Issues Vol.36 No.2 2011 OP
Page 7 and 8: Editorial The composition and subje
Page 9 and 10: Figure 1. Lima: the PREVI quarter t
Page 11 and 12: Figure 3. Remodelling of PREVI hous
Page 13 and 14: Table 1. The three PREVI-PP1 techno
Page 15 and 16: Figure 9&10. Tabibloc: rationalised
Page 17 and 18: to evaluating technical capabilitie
Page 19 and 20: nition and custom treatment’ at t
Page 21 and 22: Industrialised Building System (IBS
Page 23 and 24: Table 2. Correspondence between sat
Page 25 and 26: Table 5. Aspects of respondents’
Page 27 and 28: Table 9. Counts on renovation jobs
Page 29 and 30: LARSON, K., INTILLE, S., MCLEISH, T
Page 31 and 32: 2008). Disaster preparedness relies
Page 33 and 34: especially when these agencies have
Page 35 and 36: STR ATEGIC PLANNING OF POST-DIS- A
Page 37 and 38: housing. The Ministry awarded the w
Page 39: Table 1. Importance placed on the v
Page 43 and 44: Figure 1. Map of Old Seoul, the cir
Page 45 and 46: Figure 3. Remodeled hanoks in Bukch
Page 47 and 48: Figure 5. Although contemporary han
Page 49 and 50: R EF ERENCES ANDERSON, B.R. 1983, I
Page 51 and 52: cases, have been exclusively occupi
Page 53 and 54: typical floors with standard plans
Page 55 and 56: design creates a relationship betwe
Page 57 and 58: healthier building. Finally, Yeang
Page 59 and 60: Figure 7 a&b. The sky bridges as pu
Page 61 and 62: ing as a shading device. As the mai
Page 63 and 64: Figure 10. The reconsideration of t
Page 65 and 66: Figure 12. A diagram for the propos
Page 67 and 68: pleasant environment for residents
Page 69 and 70: (roof and facade) in whole or part;
Page 71 and 72: DED [Department of Economic Develop
Page 73 and 74: Abstract ENVIRONMENTS OF CHANGE: AN
Page 75 and 76: of the poor in identifying and occu
Page 77 and 78: Figure 1. Location of Phumolong inf
Page 79 and 80: Figure 3. View of the informal sett
Page 81 and 82: ate assembly. Hydraform dry-stackin
Page 83 and 84: Figure 8. Phased growth of building
Page 85 and 86: Abstract Ahmed Abu Al Haija Hundred
Page 87 and 88: disciplinary approach, proposing so
Page 89 and 90: egorize the different kinds of stru
Page 91 and 92:
Figure 8. Schematic plan of dwellin
Page 93 and 94:
Bardeschi, 2004). C ONC LU SIONS Th
Page 95 and 96:
Abstract A READING IN CRITICAL REGI
Page 97 and 98:
artificial, visual and tactile, myt
Page 99 and 100:
tion of the built environment (Fram
Page 101 and 102:
(Tümertekin, 2010). Tümertekin be
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 14. Rear View of the SM Hous
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 16. B2 House (photo by Cemal
Page 107 and 108:
DECISION MAKING FOR FLEXIBILITY IN
show all

Vol :37 Issue No.1 2012 - Open House International

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?