03.03.2013 Views

Basic Research Needs for Solar Energy Utilization - Office of ...

Basic Research Needs for Solar Energy Utilization - Office of ...

Basic Research Needs for Solar Energy Utilization - Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

alkaline electrolyzers require a mixing tank <strong>for</strong> KOH, which the polymer electrolyzers do not. In<br />

the comparison <strong>of</strong> hydrogen production methods described below, adjustments in efficiency and<br />

cost numbers must be made <strong>for</strong> these differences.<br />

State <strong>of</strong> the Technology<br />

The state <strong>of</strong> the technology in electrolytic systems is summarized in Table 3, where the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance characteristics are listed <strong>for</strong> a representative array <strong>of</strong> commercial electrolysis<br />

systems (NRC and NAE 2004). The data in this table have been derived from Ivy 2004, and<br />

NRC and NAE 2004. The daily production <strong>of</strong> H2 <strong>for</strong> these systems ranges from 10 kg to<br />

1,000 kg. With the exception <strong>of</strong> the Proton product, all <strong>of</strong> the electrolyzers shown are alkaline<br />

systems.<br />

In the Proton HOGON 380 PEM system, the highest conversion efficiency <strong>of</strong> electricity to<br />

molecular hydrogen is attained: 95% <strong>of</strong> the current flow results in the production <strong>of</strong> hydrogen<br />

from water. In the alkaline systems, a lower figure near 80% holds. The balance goes to side<br />

reactions. The overall system energy required to produce hydrogen ranges from 53.4 to<br />

72.4 kWh/kg. These figures include the entire energy requirement <strong>for</strong> hydrogen production,<br />

including the electrolyzer, compressor, and the other ancillary equipment depicted in the process<br />

diagram shown in Figure 70. For the Stuart and the Norsk examples, the fraction <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

energy attributable to the electrolyzer is seen to run about 83–89%. The overall system efficiency<br />

is the energy stored as hydrogen per unit input <strong>of</strong> energy expended. This result utilizes the higher<br />

heating value <strong>for</strong> hydrogen <strong>of</strong> 39 kWh/kg.<br />

Table 3 Per<strong>for</strong>mance Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Commercial Electrolyzers<br />

Electrolyzer<br />

Brand and Model<br />

H2<br />

Production<br />

(kg/day)<br />

H2/H2O<br />

Product/<br />

Reactant<br />

(%)<br />

System<br />

<strong>Energy</strong>*<br />

(kWh/kg)<br />

206<br />

Electrolyzer<br />

Portion <strong>of</strong><br />

System<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> (%)<br />

Overall<br />

System<br />

Efficiency†<br />

(%)<br />

System Power<br />

Requirement<br />

(kW)<br />

Stuart IMET 1000 130 80 55.7 83 70 288<br />

Teledyne EC –750 91 80 64.6 - 60 235<br />

Proton: HOGON 380<br />

(PEM)<br />

22 95 72.4 - 54 63<br />

Norsk Hydro type<br />

5040<br />

1040 80 53.5 89 73 2330<br />

Avalence: Hydr<strong>of</strong>iller 11 89 62.8 - 62 25<br />

* Includes a 2.3 kWh/kg adjustment <strong>for</strong> compression <strong>of</strong> the H2 to 6,000 psi (NRC and NAE 2004).<br />

† Assumes a higher heating value (HHV) <strong>of</strong> 39 kWh/kg <strong>for</strong> H2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!