06.03.2013 Views

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

206<br />

IV - BURNED LAND MAPPING, FIRE SEVERITY DETERMINATION, AND VEGETATION RECOVERY ASSESSMENT<br />

True positive False Positive<br />

dNBR 2,124 (100 %) 5,378,754 (100%)<br />

dNBR + Upgrade a) 2058, (96.89 %) 3,485,823 (64.8%)<br />

dNBR + Upgrade b) 2,124 (100 %) 5,314,345 (98.8%)<br />

dNBR + Upgrade c) 2,101 (98.91 %) 4,811,680 (89.46%)<br />

dNBR + Upgrade d) 2,082 (98.00 %) 4,705,166 (87.48%)<br />

dNBR + a),b),c) e d) 2,019 (95 %) 2,831,343 (52.64%)<br />

Table 1 - The performances of the upgraded dNBR method.<br />

4 - C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

The dNBR method performances in the mapping and detecting burnt area<br />

have been assessed, in terms of true and false positives. The method has<br />

been found not so much suitable for the unsupervised burnt area detecti<strong>on</strong><br />

and mapping in a regi<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>text, because of the high number of false<br />

positives. An upgrade of this method based <strong>on</strong> some physical c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

has been proposed and assessed. The resulting performances show a<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent reducti<strong>on</strong> of the false positives to the detriment of a slight<br />

reducti<strong>on</strong> of the true positives.<br />

Reference<br />

Chuvieco, E. and C<strong>on</strong>galt<strong>on</strong>, R.G., 1988. Mapping and inventory of forest<br />

fires from digital processing of TM data, Geocarto Internati<strong>on</strong>al, vol. 4,<br />

pp. 41-53<br />

Epting, J., Verbyla, D., Sorbel, B., 2005. Evaluati<strong>on</strong> of remotely sensed<br />

indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and<br />

ETM+, Remote Sensing of Evnvir<strong>on</strong>ment, vol. 96, pp. 328-339.<br />

Key, C.H. and Bens<strong>on</strong>, N.C., 1999. The Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR): a<br />

Landsat TM radiometric measure of burn severity, www.nrmsc.usgs.gov/<br />

research/ndbr.htm.<br />

Koutsias, N. and Karteris, M., 1998. Logistic regressi<strong>on</strong> modelling of multitemporal<br />

Thematic Mapper data for burned area mapping, Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 19, pp. 3499-3514.<br />

Martin, M.P., Gomez, I., Chuvieco, E., 2006. Burnt area index (baim) for<br />

burned area discriminati<strong>on</strong> at regi<strong>on</strong>al scale using Modis data, V Int.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>f. On <strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Fire</strong> Research, Figuerira da Foz, Portugal, 27-30 nov.<br />

2006, (D.X. Viegas Ed.).<br />

Pereira, M.C. and Setzer, A.W., 1993. Spectral characteristics of fire scars in<br />

Landsat-5 TM images of Amaz<strong>on</strong>ia, Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal of Remote<br />

Sensing, vol. 14, pp. 2061-2078.<br />

Story, M., C<strong>on</strong>galt<strong>on</strong>, R.G., 1986. Accuracy Assessment: A User’s Perspective,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!