06.03.2013 Views

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 - Methodology and results<br />

MODIS reflective and active fire data for burn mapping in Colombia 229<br />

Figure 1 - Study area: Colombia (in green), H10V08 tile (in red) and test area (in black).<br />

All burned area estimati<strong>on</strong> and mapping followed three steps: (i)<br />

Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) calculati<strong>on</strong> using the MODIS reflectance product,<br />

(ii) NBR threshold establishment using MODIS active fire informati<strong>on</strong><br />

and (iii) validati<strong>on</strong>. Image and data processing was carried out using ENVI<br />

4.2 and ArcGIS 9.2 software packages.<br />

The NBR (Key and Bens<strong>on</strong>, 1999) is a spectral index that integrates nearinfrared<br />

(NIR) and shortwave-infrared (SWIR) bands, both of which register<br />

the str<strong>on</strong>gest resp<strong>on</strong>se, albeit in opposite ways, to burning (Lentile et al.,<br />

2006; Roldán-Zamarrón et al., 2006). The NBR is estimated using the following<br />

equati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

NBR = (ρ swir – ρ nir )/(ρ swir + ρ nir ) (1)<br />

NBR threshold value was established based <strong>on</strong> the best spatial correlati<strong>on</strong><br />

between burn area as derived from the NBR image itself and MODIS active<br />

fire locati<strong>on</strong>s. On the <strong>on</strong>e hand, the NBR image was threshold using several<br />

values ranging from 0.00 to 0.10, what resulted in a set of binary images.<br />

On the other hand, active fire locati<strong>on</strong>s point format file were c<strong>on</strong>verted<br />

into a binary image of 1km pixel size. At this point it is worth pointing out<br />

that we <strong>on</strong>ly accounted for active fire locati<strong>on</strong>s occurred between the 1 st<br />

of January and the 9 th of February with a higher than 60 c<strong>on</strong>fidence value.<br />

The two sets of data were then compared using c<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> matrices in order<br />

to find the threshold value that better correlate the two types of data<br />

(post-fire reflective and active fire data). The latter was tested using the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!