7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...
7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...
7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
212<br />
IV - BURNED LAND MAPPING, FIRE SEVERITY DETERMINATION, AND VEGETATION RECOVERY ASSESSMENT<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g the indexes used in this test for Gran Canaria Island the SVI is the<br />
<strong>on</strong>e that yields better results in the applicati<strong>on</strong> to ASTER data categorizati<strong>on</strong><br />
of pixels affected by a fire, this index presents minor errors of commissi<strong>on</strong><br />
for classified burnt pixels, and the NDVI is the <strong>on</strong>e that presents<br />
minor errors of omissi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
INDEX<br />
ACCURACY<br />
KAPPA<br />
COEFFICIENT<br />
SAMPLING<br />
ERROR<br />
CONFIDENCE<br />
INTERVAL (F)<br />
RGB 92,05% 0,8385 26,10% 92,0 ± 0,5117<br />
NDVI 86,39% 0,7180 33,10% 86,4 ± 0,6486<br />
ASTER SAVI 85,59% 0,7014 33,88% 85,6 ± 0,6641<br />
SVI 86,50% 0,7213 32,98% 86,5 ± 0,6463<br />
TVI 86,41% 0,7188 33,99% 85,5 ± 0,6663<br />
RGB 95,72% 0,8813 43,19% 95,7 ± 0,8466<br />
MODIS NBR 77,48% 0,4861 164,59% 77,5 ± 3,2259<br />
BAIM 77,59% 0,5257 159,53% 77,6 ± 3,1268<br />
NDVI SAVI SVI TVI<br />
ASTER Comis. Omis. Comis. Omis Comis. Omis. Comis. Omis.<br />
Burnt 16,14 4,76 16,08 4,65 17,01 5,41 15,98 4,82<br />
Volcanic 4,6 9,7 5,12 16,94 4,66 9,76 4,65 9,68<br />
Unburned 8,65 27,16 10,05 27,51 9,64 25,75 8,84 26,87<br />
NBR BAIM<br />
MODIS Comis. Omis. Comis. Omis<br />
Burnt 0 27,41 0 28,92<br />
Unburned 55,77 0 49,84 0<br />
Table 1 - Results of the SVM algorithm applicati<strong>on</strong> to Gran Canaria ASTER and MODIS images.<br />
Also, results of sampling error, comissi<strong>on</strong> and omissi<strong>on</strong> errors and c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval.<br />
In relati<strong>on</strong> to the MODIS sensor data study the NBR presents worse percentages<br />
of accuracy (Table 1) compared to the BAIM values. Nevertheless<br />
commissi<strong>on</strong> and omissi<strong>on</strong> errors for these indexes are too high comparing<br />
to the ASTER <strong>on</strong>es, probably as an effect of the different spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong><br />
for these two types of satellite data. The sampling errors and c<strong>on</strong>fidence<br />
intervals are worse for MODIS indexes than those obtained for ASTER, probably<br />
because of the vegetati<strong>on</strong> compositi<strong>on</strong> inside the fire perimeter and<br />
the orographic influence in an insular envir<strong>on</strong>ment in which the spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong><br />
of 250 and 500 m. of MODIS channels may be not enough.