06.03.2013 Views

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

7th Workshop on Forest Fire Management - EARSeL, European ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212<br />

IV - BURNED LAND MAPPING, FIRE SEVERITY DETERMINATION, AND VEGETATION RECOVERY ASSESSMENT<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g the indexes used in this test for Gran Canaria Island the SVI is the<br />

<strong>on</strong>e that yields better results in the applicati<strong>on</strong> to ASTER data categorizati<strong>on</strong><br />

of pixels affected by a fire, this index presents minor errors of commissi<strong>on</strong><br />

for classified burnt pixels, and the NDVI is the <strong>on</strong>e that presents<br />

minor errors of omissi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

INDEX<br />

ACCURACY<br />

KAPPA<br />

COEFFICIENT<br />

SAMPLING<br />

ERROR<br />

CONFIDENCE<br />

INTERVAL (F)<br />

RGB 92,05% 0,8385 26,10% 92,0 ± 0,5117<br />

NDVI 86,39% 0,7180 33,10% 86,4 ± 0,6486<br />

ASTER SAVI 85,59% 0,7014 33,88% 85,6 ± 0,6641<br />

SVI 86,50% 0,7213 32,98% 86,5 ± 0,6463<br />

TVI 86,41% 0,7188 33,99% 85,5 ± 0,6663<br />

RGB 95,72% 0,8813 43,19% 95,7 ± 0,8466<br />

MODIS NBR 77,48% 0,4861 164,59% 77,5 ± 3,2259<br />

BAIM 77,59% 0,5257 159,53% 77,6 ± 3,1268<br />

NDVI SAVI SVI TVI<br />

ASTER Comis. Omis. Comis. Omis Comis. Omis. Comis. Omis.<br />

Burnt 16,14 4,76 16,08 4,65 17,01 5,41 15,98 4,82<br />

Volcanic 4,6 9,7 5,12 16,94 4,66 9,76 4,65 9,68<br />

Unburned 8,65 27,16 10,05 27,51 9,64 25,75 8,84 26,87<br />

NBR BAIM<br />

MODIS Comis. Omis. Comis. Omis<br />

Burnt 0 27,41 0 28,92<br />

Unburned 55,77 0 49,84 0<br />

Table 1 - Results of the SVM algorithm applicati<strong>on</strong> to Gran Canaria ASTER and MODIS images.<br />

Also, results of sampling error, comissi<strong>on</strong> and omissi<strong>on</strong> errors and c<strong>on</strong>fidence interval.<br />

In relati<strong>on</strong> to the MODIS sensor data study the NBR presents worse percentages<br />

of accuracy (Table 1) compared to the BAIM values. Nevertheless<br />

commissi<strong>on</strong> and omissi<strong>on</strong> errors for these indexes are too high comparing<br />

to the ASTER <strong>on</strong>es, probably as an effect of the different spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong><br />

for these two types of satellite data. The sampling errors and c<strong>on</strong>fidence<br />

intervals are worse for MODIS indexes than those obtained for ASTER, probably<br />

because of the vegetati<strong>on</strong> compositi<strong>on</strong> inside the fire perimeter and<br />

the orographic influence in an insular envir<strong>on</strong>ment in which the spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong><br />

of 250 and 500 m. of MODIS channels may be not enough.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!