09.03.2013 Views

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emarks that ne ... not is much preferred to ne in imperative clauses,<br />

whereas no significant survey has been made in previous studies<br />

about later ME except about Chaucer's English, where ne ... not and<br />

not are preferred to ne in imperative clauses as in early ME<br />

according to Kent (1890: 120). As far as the sample of the present<br />

study is concerned, the table below displays the consistent nature of<br />

the present condition all through the ME period:<br />

Imperative clauses19<br />

me/not i ne me. . .notl not I - I Totailsi<br />

lnever,no I - I + I + I<br />

Imperative clauses I<br />

PM (Lamb) I 1 I I I 1 I<br />

PM (Trin) I 1 I I I I I 1 I<br />

IPM(I)gb)I I I I I<br />

I0&N I I 1 I I I 1 I<br />

RH I 1 I I I I I 1 I<br />

ISEL I ii 201 281 3! 21 541<br />

ITotals ofl 4 I 21 I 28 I 3 I 2 I 58 I<br />

I Group 1 I (6.9%)! (36.2%)I (48.3%)! (5.2%)! (3.4%)! I<br />

Havelok I I I 1 I 4 I 1 I 6 I<br />

IG&E I 31 2! 31 61 1! 151<br />

IWS I 21 31 5! 101 61 261<br />

IFerumbrasi I 10 I 5 I 8 I 7 I 30 I<br />

IRA I I 81 51 41 51 22!<br />

IA&D I I I I 2 I I 2 I<br />

Totals ofl 5 I 23 I 19 I 34 I 20 I 101 I<br />

I Group 2 [ (5.0%)I (22.8%)! (18.8%)I (33.7%)I (19.8%)l I<br />

IIll I I I I 3 I I 3 I<br />

1CM I I 3! 3! 15! 16! 371<br />

ICA I 11 I 3! 9! 12! 25!<br />

IHS I 1 I 5 I 11 I 64 I 39 I 120 I<br />

IGGK I I I I 2 I 7 I 9 I<br />

lANA I 1 I I 17 I 15 I 33 I<br />

IiI I I 4 I 10 I 22 I 36 I<br />

ISMA ________ .1 1 I 1 I 6 I 8 I<br />

ITotals of 2 I 10 21 I 121 I 117 I 271 I<br />

I Group 3 (0.7%)] (3.7%) (7.7%)I (44.6%)I (43.2%)!<br />

I ________ Cf. The whole sample of Groups 1, 2, and 3<br />

I Group 1 675 I 924 I 505 I 16 I 44 I 2164 I<br />

I (31.2%)! (42.7%)I (23.3%)I (0.7%)I (2.0%)!<br />

I Group 2 566 I 655 I 295 I 253 I 434 I 2203 I<br />

I (25.7%)I (29.7%)! (13.4%) (11.5%)I (19.7%)!<br />

I Group 3 I 424 I 137 I 112 1639 I 2704 I 5016 I<br />

I I (8.5%)I (2.7%)I (2.2%) (32.7%)! (53.9%)I<br />

19 The two examples in PM are from mutually corresponding lines<br />

(PM Lamb 29, PM Trin 29).<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!