09.03.2013 Views

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1.3. General remarks<br />

As hitherto discussed, ne is common in early ME while subsequently<br />

it comes to be gradually supplanted by not, and this process takes<br />

place through the intermediate form ne ... not. The three stages of<br />

the development displayed by ne, ne ... not, and not, however, are<br />

not as clear-cut as they seem. Ne ... not is fairly unstable or rather<br />

tentative instead of being typical of ME usage as Jespersen (1917: 9)<br />

argues. The adverb not is indeed introduced in the form ne ... not<br />

first, but before ne ... not establishes itself, not alone starts to<br />

abound. Since ne alone is retained to some extent even in later ME,<br />

especially in some specific syntactic contexts, it is ne ... not, and not<br />

ne alone, that declines first. Apparently not was freely employed on<br />

its own once the adverb not was established, and there was rio need<br />

to resort to ne ... not. Since the status of ne ... not is weak, it is<br />

virtually the form ne and the form not that compete with each other<br />

in the later period of ME.<br />

It has been argued in existin g studies that a significant<br />

expansion of ne ... not takes place during the twelfth century and<br />

the decline of the adverb ne occurs from the thirteenth century<br />

onwards (Jack 1978a: 306; Kisbye 1971-2, I: 195). As far as the<br />

present study of some ME verse texts is concerned, the adverb ne<br />

seems to be preserved to a later period than has thus far been<br />

assumed. The first five manuscripts of three texts, PM (Lamb, Trin,<br />

Dgb) (towards 1200 or shortly after), 0&N (the second half of the<br />

thirteenth century), and Kil (mid-thirteenth to mid-fourteenth<br />

century) provide only limited examples of the adverb not, and of<br />

these all the examples of the adverb not are still in the tentative<br />

form ne ... not. No decline of the adverb ne has yet been indicated<br />

in these texts. As a matter of fact, the adverb ne is almost<br />

constantly included in these texts, which therefore reveal a situation<br />

virtually the same as the OE prose usage. A slightly later text SEL<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!