09.03.2013 Views

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

Yoko Iyieri PhD Thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText - University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

issue of interest, which still attracts many scholars. Visser (1963-73,<br />

III: 1411-76) gives some detailed accounts of the development of<br />

negative constructions, which include a discussion of the auxiliary<br />

do, while I)enison's (1985) account of the development of the auxiliary<br />

do, which is more theoretical, should also be mentioned here. Some<br />

new studies about this subject are still being produced. Rissanen<br />

(1991), for example, is one of the most representative.<br />

The gap of scholarship between the German scholarly tradition at<br />

the beginning of the twentieth century, which produced a number of<br />

studies on negation, and the 1970s, when a new influx of studies<br />

comes into being, witnesses a single scholar called Levin, who<br />

interests himself in a particular phenomenon of negation. He<br />

investigates negative contraction as illustrated by nam (< ne am) and<br />

nolde (< ne wolde) (Levin 1956 and 1958). The existence of the<br />

phenomenon itself had long been noted in previous studies, but Levin<br />

was the first other than Forstrom (1948) to pay special attention to<br />

the dialectal distinctions involved in it. While Forstrm (1948) only<br />

deals with the issue in relation to forms of be, Levin, however,<br />

extends his scope of investigation to all the relevant forms of<br />

negative contraction. Apparently Levin (1958) is based on his<br />

dissertation (Levin 1956), but adds some further research and<br />

corrects some factual errors. For example, Levin's (1956: 65-6)<br />

account in his dissertation that there is a distinction in the usage<br />

between prose and verse in London English and Chaucer 6 disappears<br />

in Levin (1958: 499-500), who on the contrary maintains that prose<br />

and verse do not show any noticeable differences. The omission of<br />

the old account was perhaps reasonable, since as I maintain in my<br />

dissertation, contracted forms, at least in Chaucer, are not<br />

conditioned by whether they occur in prose or verse (Iyeiri 1989a:<br />

6 His phrase 'London and Chaucer' is rather misleading, since his<br />

account is solely based on some of Chaucer's works.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!