26.03.2013 Views

Colloquium on English - Research Institute for Waldorf Education

Colloquium on English - Research Institute for Waldorf Education

Colloquium on English - Research Institute for Waldorf Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108<br />

authority, and thus to <strong>for</strong>m those sentences that we present to the children in the most artistic way. We need<br />

to artistically <strong>for</strong>m the sentences so that we draw from the child a feeling <strong>for</strong> their artistic <strong>for</strong>m. That is<br />

something we can do when we make the children aware of the difference between an asserti<strong>on</strong> or a questi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

or perhaps a statement of feeling, and have the child speak it in such a way that a statement with<br />

feeling is spoken with the int<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> of an asserti<strong>on</strong>. We can then make the children aware of how an<br />

asserti<strong>on</strong> is spoken in a neutral, objective way; whereas a statement of feeling is spoken with certain nuances<br />

of feeling. We can work with this artistic element of language, then out of that element develop grammar<br />

and syntax.<br />

If we use dialect in order to develop the natural human instinct <strong>for</strong> language while using standard<br />

language in order to awaken an inner feeling <strong>for</strong> style, we can achieve what is necessary in teaching language.<br />

The Renewal of Educati<strong>on</strong> (158–160)<br />

Bringing Language to Life<br />

Today hardly any<strong>on</strong>e is interested in trying to bring life into language. I have tried to do that in my<br />

books in homeopathic doses. In order to make certain things understandable, I have used in my books a<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cept that has the same relati<strong>on</strong>ship to <strong>for</strong>ce as water flowing in a stream does to the ice <strong>on</strong> top of the<br />

stream. I used the word kraften (to work actively, <strong>for</strong>cefully). Usually we <strong>on</strong>ly have the word Kraft, meaning<br />

“power” or “<strong>for</strong>ce.” We do not speak of kraften. We can also use similar words. If we are to bring life into<br />

language, then we also need a syntax that is alive, not dead. Today people correct you immediately if you<br />

put the subject somewhere in the sentence other than where people are accustomed to having it. Such<br />

things are still just possible in German, and you still have a certain amount of freedom. In the Western<br />

European languages—well, that is just terrible, everything is wr<strong>on</strong>g there. You hear all the time that you<br />

can’t say that, that is not <strong>English</strong>, or that is not French. But, to say “that is not German” is not possible. In<br />

German you can put the subject anywhere in the sentence. You can also give an inner life to the sentence in<br />

some way. I do not want to speak in popular terms, but I do want to emphasize the process of dying in the<br />

language. A language begins to die when you are always hearing that you cannot say something in <strong>on</strong>e way<br />

or another, that you are speaking incorrectly. It may not seem as strange but it is just the same as if a<br />

hundred people were to go to a door and I were to look at them and decide purely according to my own<br />

views who was a good pers<strong>on</strong> and who was a bad pers<strong>on</strong>. Life does not allow us to stereotype things. When<br />

we do that, it appears grotesque. Life requires that everything remain in movement. For that reas<strong>on</strong>, syntax<br />

and grammar must arise out of the life of feeling, not out of dead reas<strong>on</strong>ing. That perspective will enable us<br />

to c<strong>on</strong>tinue with a living development of language. The Renewal of Educati<strong>on</strong> (180-181)<br />

Working with the Unc<strong>on</strong>scious Element in Language<br />

If you understand the spirit of what I have just presented, you will recognize how everywhere there<br />

has been an attempt to work with this unc<strong>on</strong>scious element. I have d<strong>on</strong>e that first by showing how the<br />

artistic element is necessary right from the very beginning of elementary school. I have insisted that we<br />

should use the dialect that the children speak to reveal the c<strong>on</strong>tent of grammar, that is, we should take the<br />

children’s language as such and accept it as something complete and then use it as the basis <strong>for</strong> presenting<br />

grammar. Think <strong>for</strong> a moment about what you do in such a case. In what period of life is speech actually<br />

<strong>for</strong>med? Attempt to think back as far as you can in the course of your life, and you will see that you can<br />

remember nothing from the period in which you could not speak. Human beings learn language in a<br />

period when they are still sleeping through life. If you then compare the dreamy world of the child’s soul<br />

with dreams and with how melodies are interwoven in music, you will see that they are similar. Like<br />

dreaming, learning to speak occurs through the unc<strong>on</strong>scious, and is something like an awakening at dawn.<br />

Melodies simply exist and we do not know where they come from. In reality, they arise out of this sleep

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!