26.03.2013 Views

Colloquium on English - Research Institute for Waldorf Education

Colloquium on English - Research Institute for Waldorf Education

Colloquium on English - Research Institute for Waldorf Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110<br />

That should be an unc<strong>on</strong>scious process. It must occur as a matter of course. As I menti<strong>on</strong>ed, we should<br />

have the music teachers hold off <strong>on</strong> such things until the children are older, when they will be less influenced<br />

by them. Children should be taught about the melodic element in an unc<strong>on</strong>scious way through a<br />

discussi<strong>on</strong> of the themes. The artificial methods I menti<strong>on</strong>ed have just as bad an effect as it would have to<br />

teach children drawing by showing them how to hold their arms instead of giving them a feeling <strong>for</strong> line. It<br />

would be like saying to a child, “You will be able to draw an acanthus leaf if you <strong>on</strong>ly learn to hold your arm<br />

in such and such a way and to move it in such and such a way.” Through this and similar methods, we do<br />

nothing more than to simply c<strong>on</strong>sider the human organism from a materialistic standpoint, as a machine<br />

that needs to be adjusted so it does <strong>on</strong>e thing properly. If we begin from a spiritual standpoint, we will<br />

always make the detour through the soul and allow the organism to adjust itself to what is properly felt in<br />

the soul.<br />

We can there<strong>for</strong>e say that if we support the child in the drawing element, we give the child a<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship to its envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and if we support the child in the musical element, then we give the child<br />

a relati<strong>on</strong>ship to something that is not in our normal envir<strong>on</strong>ment, but in the envir<strong>on</strong>ment we exist in from<br />

the time of falling asleep until awakening. These two polarities are then combined when we teach grammar,<br />

<strong>for</strong> instance. Here we need to interweave a feeling <strong>for</strong> the structure of a sentence with an understanding of<br />

how to <strong>for</strong>m sentences.<br />

We need to know such things if we are to properly understand how beginning at approximately the<br />

age of twelve, we slowly prepare the intellectual aspect of understanding, namely, free will. Be<strong>for</strong>e the age of<br />

twelve, we need to protect the child from independent judgments. We attempt to base judgment up<strong>on</strong><br />

authority so that authority has a certain unc<strong>on</strong>scious effect up<strong>on</strong> the child. Through such methods we can<br />

have an effect unbeknownst to the child. Through this kind of relati<strong>on</strong>ship to the child, we already have an<br />

element that is very similar to the musical dreamlike element. The Renewal of Educati<strong>on</strong> (194-195)<br />

Teaching Grammar and Syntax<br />

You cannot teach a <strong>for</strong>eign language in school without really working at grammar, both ordinary<br />

grammar and syntax. It is particularly necessary <strong>for</strong> children older than twelve to be made c<strong>on</strong>scious of<br />

what lies in grammar, but here, too, you can proceed very circumspectly. This morning in our study of the<br />

human being I said that in ordinary life we <strong>for</strong>m c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s and then proceed to judgment and c<strong>on</strong>cept.<br />

[See lecture 9, The Foundati<strong>on</strong>s of Human Experience.] Although you cannot present the children directly<br />

with this logical method, it will underlie your teaching of grammar. Particularly with the help of the less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

in <strong>for</strong>eign languages, you will do well to discuss matters of the world with the children in a way that will<br />

allow grammar less<strong>on</strong>s to arise organically. It is purely a matter of structuring such a thing properly. Start by<br />

shaping a complete sentence and not more than a sentence. Point to what is going <strong>on</strong> outside—at this very<br />

moment you would have an excellent example.<br />

You could very well combine grammar with a <strong>for</strong>eign language by letting the children express in<br />

Latin and French and German, <strong>for</strong> example, “It is raining.” Start by eliciting from the children the statement<br />

“It is raining.” Then point out to them (they are, after all, older children) that they are expressing a<br />

pure activity when they say: “It rains.” Now you can proceed to another sentence; you can include, if you<br />

like, <strong>for</strong>eign languages, <strong>for</strong> you will save a great deal of time and energy if you also work this method into<br />

the <strong>for</strong>eign language less<strong>on</strong>. You say to the children: “Instead of the scene outside in the rain, imagine to<br />

yourselves a meadow in springtime.” Lead the children until they say of that meadow, “It is greening, it<br />

greens.” And then take them further until they trans<strong>for</strong>m the sentence “It is greening,” into the sentence<br />

“The meadow is greening.” And, finally, lead them still further until they can trans<strong>for</strong>m the sentence “The<br />

meadow is greening,” into the c<strong>on</strong>cept of a “green meadow.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!