27.03.2013 Views

Livestock Services and the Poor: A global initiative - IFAD

Livestock Services and the Poor: A global initiative - IFAD

Livestock Services and the Poor: A global initiative - IFAD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 1: POOR LIVESTOCK KEEPERS<br />

As <strong>the</strong> table illustrates, <strong>the</strong> majority of women in Kenya viewed<br />

livestock primarily as a means to ensure food security for <strong>the</strong><br />

family, whereas men perceived livestock as a means to meet<br />

present needs, such as food <strong>and</strong> school fees, <strong>and</strong> as a form<br />

of investment.<br />

The responses did not show <strong>the</strong> same profile in Bolivia. In<br />

Bolivia, both men <strong>and</strong> women consider livestock to be a source of<br />

income <strong>and</strong> a guarantee of future food security. However, men<br />

value livestock highly as aids in <strong>the</strong> performance of agricultural<br />

activities such as ploughing, which confirms <strong>the</strong> traditional division<br />

of labour in Bolivia, where men hold <strong>the</strong> main responsibility for<br />

<strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>and</strong> ploughing of fields.<br />

In India, both men <strong>and</strong> women highlighted <strong>the</strong> role of livestock<br />

in income generation <strong>and</strong> food security. Interestingly, few men said<br />

that livestock ownership confirmed a household’s social status.<br />

The differing perceptions can lead to work-related conflicts<br />

within <strong>the</strong> household. For example, in India, women often voiced<br />

resentment over <strong>the</strong> additional workload that livestock ownership<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>ed. Similarly, a group of women in a Mexican village<br />

complained about <strong>the</strong> labour dem<strong>and</strong> represented by <strong>the</strong> cattle<br />

belonging to <strong>the</strong>ir husb<strong>and</strong>s. They saw cattle as unproductive<br />

assets that <strong>the</strong>y have to tend only because <strong>the</strong>ir husb<strong>and</strong>s perceive<br />

cattle as <strong>the</strong> basis of status <strong>and</strong> authority in <strong>the</strong> local community. In<br />

contrast, <strong>the</strong> Mexican women consider poultry readily accessible<br />

capital for meeting daily consumption needs <strong>and</strong> pigs as a sound<br />

investment that can be readily capitalized in times of need<br />

(Villarreal, 2001).<br />

Ownership <strong>and</strong> control of livestock<br />

The traditional view is that women may own <strong>the</strong> livestock in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

care, but that <strong>the</strong>y have little control over it. For example, women<br />

in pastoralist <strong>and</strong> agropastoralist societies in Eastern Africa<br />

generally obtain livestock through culturally formalized ceremonial<br />

events, but rarely via <strong>the</strong> marketplace. <strong>Livestock</strong> is given to woman<br />

in marriage ei<strong>the</strong>r through bride wealth, or through allocation by<br />

<strong>the</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> or <strong>the</strong> men family members (Joekes <strong>and</strong> Pointing,<br />

1991; Watson, 1994; Smith-Oboler, 1996). Women also inherit<br />

Women may own <strong>the</strong><br />

livestock, but have little<br />

control over it<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!