29.03.2013 Views

PSYCHEDELICS - Sciencemadness.org

PSYCHEDELICS - Sciencemadness.org

PSYCHEDELICS - Sciencemadness.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

211___________<br />

____________________________________________________ Psychedelics<br />

LSD-25 (either by mouth or injected into the peritoneal cavity),<br />

he invariably noted an increase in threshold, i.e., an impairment<br />

of vision, whereas motor and discriminative functions<br />

were not grossly disturbed. The rise in threshold could<br />

again be related to the reduction in transmission in the thalamus,<br />

as noted by Evarts.<br />

The present author studied the effect of LSD-25 on visually<br />

evoked responses in rabbits (Koella and Wells, 1959). The<br />

animals were supplied with chronically implanted electrodes<br />

to record the signals in the visual projection area of the cortex<br />

in response to repetitive (one every five seconds) light flashes.<br />

During the experiments the rabbits were semi-restricted in<br />

their movements by being wrapped in burlap sacking, but<br />

were otherwise unrestrained by either mechanical devices or<br />

drugs. We confirmed Purpura's observations that LSD-25<br />

(25-50 µg total dose) increased somewhat the cortical<br />

evoked response (figure 5, A).<br />

More significant, however, was an additional observation<br />

pertaining to variability of response. It is common knowledge<br />

that under physiological conditions and particularly in awake<br />

animals, indicators such as evoked responses vary greatly in<br />

amplitude when the stimulus is given repetitively to produce<br />

a whole series of evoked signals. In our experimental situa-<br />

tion, the evoked responses (to constant, standardized stim-<br />

uli) changed in amplitude over a range as great as 1:20 or<br />

more. LSD-25, in the dose mentioned, drastically decreased<br />

this variability down to about 25 per cent of the original<br />

value (figure 5, VA, and figure 6 ) . The latency of the re-<br />

sponse (i.e., the time elapsed between the stimulus and the<br />

appearance of the response, signaling the transmission time<br />

from the retinal light receptors to the cortex) was somewhat<br />

decreased, and again its variability was greatly reduced under<br />

LSD-25 (figure 5, VL).<br />

amplitude and latency) at each time for each of seven animals.<br />

In the case of variability, they indicate variance of the ten meas-<br />

urements. The full lines represent the means for all seven ani-<br />

mals. Note slight protracted increase in amplitude and decrease<br />

in latency after LSD-25 (given at o hours). Note decrease and,<br />

after one to two hours, increase of variability of amplitude and<br />

latency. (From Koella and Wells, 1959; reprinted by permission<br />

of the American Journal o f Physiology.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!