Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

The outcome of this survey shows the highest assessment
for the performance of the Chairperson of Council
and the relationship between Council and the Vice-
Chancellor for both 2010 and 2011. In general, the entire
performance of Council was assessed fairly positively
with rated assessment scores of all items ranging from
74 to 100 and 85 to 100 index points for 2010 and
2011 respectively.
Further, in compliance with the principles of King III, the
Audit and Enterprise Risk Management Committee
(AERMC) went through a similar process of self-assessment
for the first time in 2011. The evaluation instrument
was objectively developed in accordance with the
best practice norms and the results were independently
analysed and evaluated by the BMR.
AERMC self-assessment performance assessment
rating for 2011
I am satisfied with the results of both assessments which
I deem a validation of my view that the Unisa Council,
Executive Management and extended management
have served the university in an exemplary manner in
fulfilling their responsibilities and duties in 2011. I would
like to thank each one of them and I sincerely believe
that Unisa is richer for their engagement and involvement.
Dr N Mathews Phosa
Chairperson of Council
Relationship with Council
Membership and appointments
Terms of reference
Financial reporting
Internal audit process
Internal financial controls and risk management systems
External audit process
Training and resources
Whistle blowing
UNISA ANNUAL REPORT 2011
Poor 0 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent
| 19 |
3.95
3.84
3.84
3.61
3.47
3.26
3.20
4.33
4.27