02.04.2013 Views

Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNISA ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2011</strong><br />

REPORT ON INTERNAL<br />

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS<br />

<strong>Unisa</strong> uses internal administrative controls to provide reasonable assurance that <strong>the</strong> following<br />

activities are accomplished:<br />

• <strong>the</strong> university’s objectives are achieved on an effective, efficient, economical, socially responsible<br />

and ethical basis<br />

• financial <strong>report</strong>ing is accurate, timely and in accordance with financial <strong>report</strong>ing standards;<br />

• assets and information are safeguarded<br />

• quality is improved<br />

• legislation and regulations are complied with<br />

• <strong>the</strong> ethical culture is infused into <strong>the</strong> operational activities of employees.<br />

The existing internal administrative controls are directive, detective and corrective and include<br />

policies, procedures and standard business forms; defined structures, roles, responsibilities and<br />

segregation of duties; and delegation of authority and signing powers, accountability processes<br />

and system controls.<br />

All policies are compiled and/or revised through a due diligence process and approved at Council<br />

level. The due diligence process gives some level of assurance pertaining to <strong>the</strong> probity and compliance<br />

with institutional standards. Business forms have been incrementally standardised to assist<br />

employees in <strong>the</strong>ir day-to-day activities, structures have been revised and approved, and roles<br />

and responsibilities are defined as reflected in <strong>the</strong> structures. The segregation of duties is established<br />

through <strong>the</strong> aforementioned structures and responsibilities. The delegation of authority<br />

and signing powers is designed to mitigate <strong>the</strong> risk of unauthorised transactions and accountability<br />

processes, as well as labour relations operations such as internal disciplinary and grievance<br />

processes.<br />

Systems are widely used in <strong>the</strong> university and system controls are in place to secure <strong>the</strong> systems<br />

control over <strong>the</strong> input, processing and output of information. This receives attention<br />

during <strong>the</strong> systems design phase, and improvements for input, processing and output controls<br />

are continuously assessed through internal and external assurance reviews. Back-ups of data<br />

are made and a disaster recovery plan is available for <strong>the</strong> university. Fortunately <strong>Unisa</strong> has<br />

not had to put <strong>the</strong> efficacy of <strong>the</strong> plans and systems to <strong>the</strong> test. Information communication<br />

and technology standards are in <strong>the</strong> process of being embedded into <strong>the</strong> systems and<br />

ICT is aligned to <strong>the</strong> university’s objectives with an ever-increasing focus on service delivery,<br />

support and control over processes and data.<br />

The determination of strategic and operational objectives is based on an established<br />

and proven planning methodology and is inclusive of risk management practices.<br />

The planning process has commenced with a dedicated focus on identification of<br />

<strong>the</strong> risks associated with <strong>the</strong> planned objectives as well as <strong>the</strong> appropriate mitigation<br />

strategies to address <strong>the</strong> risks.<br />

| 53 |

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!