02.04.2013 Views

Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

Download the Annual report 2011 - Unisa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Since <strong>the</strong> merger in 2006, <strong>the</strong> focus of <strong>the</strong> university has<br />

increasingly veered toward effective, efficient, economic<br />

use of resources — and ethics became more of a focus<br />

point during 2008. <strong>2011</strong> saw a renewed and intense<br />

ethics drive on <strong>the</strong> part of Management and this process<br />

is set to continue concertedly through <strong>the</strong> next planning<br />

phase, and as an ongoing institutional focus. Although<br />

<strong>the</strong> university has not yet reached its target on effective,<br />

efficient, economic and ethical operations, plans are in<br />

place to introduce and embed <strong>the</strong> necessary improvement<br />

standards – including ensuring continual policy reviews,<br />

establishing and implementing procedures to<br />

ensure certainty of acceptable practices, and clarifying<br />

and/or re-defining roles and responsibilities to promote<br />

accountability — and many have already been implemented.<br />

Council, operating through its Audit and Enterprise Risk<br />

Management Committee (AERMC), oversees <strong>the</strong> university’s<br />

corporate governance, control and risk matters.<br />

The Management of <strong>the</strong> university monitors institutional<br />

risk, ethics and controls through <strong>the</strong> Risk, Ethics and<br />

Controls Committee (RECC) to pay attention to recommendations<br />

made in audit <strong>report</strong>s. All RECC <strong>report</strong>s are<br />

submitted to and discussed at <strong>the</strong> Management Committee<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n submitted to <strong>the</strong> AERMC. Late in <strong>2011</strong><br />

a Compliance Department was approved by Council to<br />

give greater attention to <strong>the</strong> aspect of controls compliance<br />

at <strong>the</strong> university. While compliance was monitored<br />

in a decentralised manner in both ICT and Finance, <strong>the</strong><br />

institution of <strong>the</strong> Compliance Department will provide<br />

better institutional insight into this area. The structure<br />

of <strong>the</strong> department has been approved and positions will<br />

be filled from 2012.<br />

Compliance reviews were also performed by <strong>the</strong> Internal<br />

Audit Department. A well-established internal audit<br />

function exists that is independent and objective and<br />

provides assurance and consulting services to <strong>the</strong> university’s<br />

Council and Management on governance, risk<br />

management and controls. Reports issued by <strong>the</strong> internal<br />

audit function receive appropriate attention from <strong>the</strong><br />

Management Committee and <strong>the</strong> Audit and Enterprise<br />

Risk Management Committee. Where weaknesses in<br />

any of <strong>the</strong> controls are identified through <strong>the</strong> aforementioned<br />

internal assurance reviews, recommendations are<br />

made to improve control and Management develops appropriate<br />

action plans to address <strong>the</strong> weaknesses. A<br />

process of following up on internal audit and external<br />

audit <strong>report</strong>s is well established and supported by <strong>the</strong><br />

Department: Internal Audit and <strong>the</strong> Directorate: Enterprise<br />

Risk Management.<br />

UNISA ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2011</strong><br />

| 54 |<br />

It must be noted, however, that <strong>the</strong> system of internal<br />

administrative controls is effective only to <strong>the</strong> extent that<br />

human error, noncompliance and intentional circumvention<br />

can be prohibited or prevented in a timely manner.<br />

The system of control is thus not entirely infallible.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> university’s focus in <strong>2011</strong> was on <strong>the</strong> effective,<br />

efficient, economic, social and ethical approach to its activities,<br />

controls and compliance <strong>the</strong>rewith were assessed.<br />

Where weaknesses or noncompliance were<br />

identified, <strong>the</strong>se were raised with <strong>the</strong> line managers for<br />

<strong>the</strong> controls to be reconsidered and improved. In most<br />

instances, <strong>the</strong> levels of acquiescence and co-operation<br />

toward ensuring a strict control environment could not<br />

be faulted. However, in some instances implementation<br />

was slower than required. These cases were identified<br />

and dealt with in <strong>the</strong> follow-up audits.<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> findings, <strong>Unisa</strong> assessed its internal administrative<br />

controls for <strong>the</strong> financial year ended 31 December<br />

<strong>2011</strong> taking cognisance of <strong>the</strong> results and findings<br />

from <strong>the</strong> continuous and periodic internal assurance<br />

reviews. Based on this assessment, <strong>Unisa</strong> believes that<br />

for <strong>the</strong> financial year ended 31 December <strong>2011</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

internal administrative controls reasonably meet <strong>the</strong> criteria<br />

to effectively, efficiently, economically and ethically<br />

safeguard its employees, operations, information and<br />

assets, and to ensure accountability to its stakeholders.<br />

Ms A Steenkamp<br />

Executive Director: Internal Audit<br />

Advocate V Kahla<br />

Chairperson: Audit and Enterprise Risk<br />

Management Committee<br />

<strong>Unisa</strong> Council

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!