04.04.2013 Views

Mireille Falardeau et Michel Loranger Le choix de stratégies ... - CSSE

Mireille Falardeau et Michel Loranger Le choix de stratégies ... - CSSE

Mireille Falardeau et Michel Loranger Le choix de stratégies ... - CSSE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

440 JAMES R. COVERT<br />

wh<strong>et</strong>her the arbitration board’s <strong>de</strong>cision would have been swayed by a lou<strong>de</strong>r<br />

outcry from the local community. It is interesting that when the school board<br />

appealed the Bonnier ruling, the Quebec Superior Court upheld the finding of the<br />

arbitration board, saying that the board was within its rights when its members<br />

used their own personal knowledge and experience to interpr<strong>et</strong> Roman Catholic<br />

doctrine.<br />

In Alberta, Ms. Casagran<strong>de</strong> was dismissed from her teaching position for<br />

living an inappropriate lifestyle that happened to manifest itself in pregnancy. In<br />

Quebec, Mr. Bonnier was judged not to be living an inappropriate lifestyle even<br />

though he was co-habiting with a stu<strong>de</strong>nt from his class of the previous year, and<br />

allowed a photograph of himself in the nu<strong>de</strong> with his partner to be published in<br />

a newspaper. Although the premarital living arrangements in both instances may<br />

have been similar, the evi<strong>de</strong>nce of their co-habitation was quite different. The<br />

resultant disciplinary action imposed by the judicial system was diam<strong>et</strong>rically<br />

opposed even though Roman Catholic doctrine governed both cases. This suggests<br />

that local preference may play a role in judicial rulings even beyond the<br />

school board level.<br />

The Shewan Case<br />

Another case that involves the local community <strong>de</strong>fining what should count as<br />

an appropriate teacher behaviour ma<strong>de</strong> its way to the highest court in British<br />

Columbia in 1987. The Shewan case arose from another instance of teacher nudity;<br />

this time, however, there was a public outcry, and it occurred while school<br />

was in session. The case differs from the previous cases because it occurred in<br />

a non-<strong>de</strong>nominational school and therefore the teacher’s behaviour was not governed<br />

by <strong>de</strong>nominational doctrine.<br />

John and Ilze Shewan were both teaching in the public school system in Abbotsford,<br />

British Columbia. John took a photograph of Ilze posing semi-nu<strong>de</strong> that<br />

was published in Gallery magazine. The couple was married at the time and the<br />

picture was mo<strong>de</strong>st compared to the full frontal nudity of Mr. Bonnier and Miss<br />

Nu<strong>de</strong> Quebec. The school board suspen<strong>de</strong>d both teachers for six weeks and the<br />

Shewans appealed the <strong>de</strong>cision.<br />

Because Mr. and Mrs. Shewan were employed in a non-<strong>de</strong>nominational<br />

school, the question of what should count as a standard of teacher behaviour<br />

arose. This standard could have been <strong>de</strong>rived from either the local community<br />

or the larger Canadian soci<strong>et</strong>y. In the first appeal, the Board of Reference<br />

reversed the school board’s <strong>de</strong>cision and ruled in favour of the Shewans, saying:<br />

The question we believe that should be asked is not wh<strong>et</strong>her the Shewans’ conduct fell<br />

below some of the community standards but wh<strong>et</strong>her it was within the accepted standards<br />

of tolerance in contemporary Canadian soci<strong>et</strong>y. 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!