constituent assembly of india debates (proceedings)- volume vii
constituent assembly of india debates (proceedings)- volume vii
constituent assembly of india debates (proceedings)- volume vii
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Shri H. V. Kamath: Are we going to have a recess from9th December to a date to be specified later?<br />
Mr. President: It all depends on the business on hand. I have suggested more than once that I do<br />
not want to curtail discussion. As we are considering the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the country, we shall not do<br />
anything in a hurry; but at the same time I do not want waste time.<br />
Shri H. V. Kamath: Are we going to adjourn on the 9thDecember, irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether we<br />
complete the consideration <strong>of</strong> the Constitution or not?<br />
Mr. President: That we shall see.<br />
Shri H. V. Kamath: You were pleased to remark in the morning as regards the non-participation <strong>of</strong><br />
Hyderabad and Bhopal, that it is a matter entirely for the Government to consider. Mr. President,<br />
according to our Rules you have power to call upon the rulers <strong>of</strong> Hyderabad and other States to send<br />
representatives to the Constituent Assembly. But, you were pleased to say that it is a matter in the<br />
hands <strong>of</strong> Government. I do not know how the Government comes into this affair. You are fully authorised<br />
to call upon the rulers to send their representatives to the Assembly.<br />
Mr. President: Sitting in this Assembly, I have no right to compel anybody to do anything. Those<br />
who have come in are entitled to participate in the deliberations <strong>of</strong> this Assembly and those who have<br />
not come, we cannot force them to come. It is for the Government to deal with them.<br />
Shri Algu Rai Shastri : *[Mr. President, as far as I remember you had announced in the last session<br />
that the Constitution to be presented here would be in Hindi and that it might be translated into English.<br />
But the statement you have made today has been a source <strong>of</strong> disappointment in as much as we learn<br />
that we have to discuss the very Draft that has been prepared by the Drafting Committee in English. We<br />
have before us its Hindi version also. I do not understand why we should not take into consideration the<br />
Hindi version <strong>of</strong> the Draft when it is before us. We may take up for consideration the Hindi version <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Draft clause by clause and if any portion is found to be translated in rather difficult language. Dr.<br />
Ambedkar who himself is a great scholar <strong>of</strong> the Sanskrit language, may explain such portion from the<br />
English Draft to those who are unable to follow the version in Hindi. It is necessary for every county to<br />
frame its constitution in its own language. We belong to a country that has its own language. We should<br />
therefore discuss it clause by clause in our own language. The Draft prepared in a foreign language<br />
should not be presented to this House for discussion.<br />
Sir, perhaps you remember that at the commencement <strong>of</strong> the first session <strong>of</strong> the Constituent<br />
Assembly I made a request that the discussion in this House should be carried on in a language which is<br />
understood by the people <strong>of</strong> this country. We should not proceed in this House as if it were the British<br />
Parliament. The word `Dominion' is entirely foreign in character. I remember a saying <strong>of</strong> the late<br />
Moulana Mohammad Ali. He used to say that the word` Dominion' might be applicable to Africa, South<br />
Africa, New Zealand, Australia and Tasmania. These are the dominions where our alien rulers had<br />
founded colonies and established cantonments. But India cannot be said to be a cantonment for the<br />
British. They went to the countries I have already named and established there their colonies and<br />
cantonments; they also carried their language with them and the people <strong>of</strong> those countries are English<br />
speaking. But this cannot be said in our case. We have our own language, our own civilization which has<br />
come down to us through hundreds <strong>of</strong> centuries; so also we have our own literature. Just as the English<br />
people can take pride in their literature, in Shakespeare and Milton, we too can be proud <strong>of</strong> the works <strong>of</strong><br />
our Kalidas, Tulsidas, Jayasi and Soordas. It will be matter <strong>of</strong> deep shame for a country which has<br />
developed a language <strong>of</strong> its own, to frame its first free Constitution in a foreign language. Therefore, I<br />
would like to entreat you, to pray to you that the Hindi version <strong>of</strong> the Draft Constitution should be placed<br />
before this House as the original Draft <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The clauses <strong>of</strong> the Hindi version should be<br />
discussed here and the English Draft should not be presented here for discussion. It should be treated